Kauvar David S, Holcomb John B, Norris Gary C, Hess John R
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA.
J Trauma. 2006 Jul;61(1):181-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000222671.84335.64.
The transfusion of fresh whole blood (FWB) for trauma-induced coagulopathy is unusual in civilian practice. However, US military physicians have used FWB in every combat operation since the practice was introduced in World War I and continue to do so during current military operations. We discuss our review of all blood products administered to US military casualties in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) between March and December 2003. FWB transfusions were most frequent when demands for massive transfusions wiped out existing blood supplies. FWB patients had the highest blood product requirements; however, mortality did not differ significantly between FWB and non-FWB patients overall or for massively transfused patients. We review the current military practice of FWB transfusion in combat theaters and conclude that FWB transfusion is convenient, safe, and effective in certain military situations.
在民用医疗实践中,因创伤性凝血病而输注新鲜全血(FWB)的情况并不常见。然而,自第一次世界大战引入该做法以来,美国军方医生在每次作战行动中都使用新鲜全血,并且在当前军事行动中仍在继续使用。我们讨论了对2003年3月至12月伊拉克自由行动(OIF)期间美国军事伤亡人员所输注的所有血液制品的审查情况。当大量输血需求耗尽现有血液储备时,新鲜全血输注最为频繁。输注新鲜全血的患者对血液制品的需求量最大;然而,总体而言,输注新鲜全血的患者与未输注新鲜全血的患者之间,以及大量输血患者之间的死亡率并无显著差异。我们回顾了战区目前使用新鲜全血进行输血的军事实践,并得出结论:在某些军事情况下,输注新鲜全血方便、安全且有效。