Suppr超能文献

与院前输注晶体液相比,疑似创伤性出血的平民患者院前输注红细胞悬液的死亡率。

Mortality of civilian patients with suspected traumatic haemorrhage receiving pre-hospital transfusion of packed red blood cells compared to pre-hospital crystalloid.

机构信息

Kent, Surrey & Sussex Air Ambulance Trust, Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill, RH1 5YP, UK.

Academic Department of Military Anaesthesia and Critical Care, London, UK.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Nov 20;26(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0567-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major haemorrhage is a leading cause of mortality following major trauma. Increasingly, Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) in the United Kingdom provide pre-hospital transfusion with blood products, although the evidence to support this is equivocal. This study compares mortality for patients with suspected traumatic haemorrhage transfused with pre-hospital packed red blood cells (PRBC) compared to crystalloid.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective observational cohort study between 1 January 2010 and 1 February 2015. Patients triggering a pre-hospital Code Red activation were eligible. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 6 hours (h) and 28 days (d), including a sub-analysis of patients receiving a major and massive transfusion. Multivariable regression models predicted mortality. Multiple Imputation was employed, and logistic regression models were constructed for all imputed datasets.

RESULTS

The crystalloid (n = 103) and PRBC (n = 92) group were comparable for demographics, Injury Severity Score (p = 0.67) and mechanism of injury (p = 0.73). Observed 6 h mortality was smaller in the PRBC group (n = 10, 10%) compared to crystalloid group (n = 19, 18%). Adjusted OR was not statistically significant (OR 0.48, CI 0.19-1.19, p = 0.11). Observed mortality at 28 days was smaller in the PRBC group (n = 21, 26%) compared to crystalloid group (n = 31, 40%), p = 0.09. Adjusted OR was not statistically significant (OR 0.66, CI 0.32-1.35, p = 0.26). A statistically significant greater proportion of the crystalloid group required a major transfusion (n = 62, 60%) compared to the PRBC group (n = 41, 40%), p = 0.02. For patients requiring a massive transfusion observed mortality was smaller in the PRBC group at 28 days (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

In a single centre UK HEMS study, in patients with suspected traumatic haemorrhage who received a PRBC transfusion there was an observed, but non-significant, reduction in mortality at 6 h and 28 days, also reflected in a massive transfusion subgroup. Patients receiving pre-hospital PRBC were significantly less likely to require an in-hospital major transfusion. Further adequately powered multi-centre prospective research is required to establish the optimum strategy for pre-hospital volume replacement in patients with traumatic haemorrhage.

摘要

背景

大出血是创伤后主要死亡原因。在英国,越来越多的直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)在院前提供血液制品输血,尽管支持这一做法的证据尚无定论。本研究比较了疑似创伤性出血患者输注院前浓缩红细胞(PRBC)与晶体液的死亡率。

方法

这是一项 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 2 月 1 日期间在单一中心进行的回顾性观察队列研究。符合触发院前 Code Red 激活标准的患者符合入选条件。主要结局测量指标为 6 小时(h)和 28 天(d)的全因死亡率,包括对接受大量输血和超大剂量输血患者的亚组分析。多变量回归模型预测死亡率。采用多重插补法,对所有插补数据集进行逻辑回归模型构建。

结果

晶体液组(n=103)和 PRBC 组(n=92)的人口统计学、损伤严重程度评分(p=0.67)和损伤机制(p=0.73)相似。PRBC 组的 6 小时观察死亡率(n=10,10%)低于晶体液组(n=19,18%),但差异无统计学意义。调整后的比值比(OR)无统计学意义(OR 0.48,95%CI 0.19-1.19,p=0.11)。PRBC 组的 28 天观察死亡率(n=21,26%)低于晶体液组(n=31,40%),但差异无统计学意义(p=0.09)。调整后的 OR 无统计学意义(OR 0.66,95%CI 0.32-1.35,p=0.26)。晶体液组需要大量输血的比例显著高于 PRBC 组(n=62,60%)(p=0.02)。对于需要进行大量输血的患者,PRBC 组在 28 天的观察死亡率较低(p=0.07)。

结论

在英国单一中心 HEMS 研究中,接受 PRBC 输血的疑似创伤性出血患者在 6 小时和 28 天的死亡率观察到(但无统计学意义)降低,在大量输血亚组中也有反映。接受院前 PRBC 输血的患者明显不太需要院内大量输血。需要进一步进行充分的多中心前瞻性研究,以确定创伤性出血患者院前容量替代的最佳策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f194/6245557/f851f7fc7183/13049_2018_567_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验