Suppr超能文献

6-31B(d)基组以及BMC-QCISD和BMC-CCSD多系数相关方法。

The 6-31B(d) basis set and the BMC-QCISD and BMC-CCSD multicoefficient correlation methods.

作者信息

Lynch Benjamin J, Zhao Yan, Truhlar Donald G

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Supercomputer Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Chem A. 2005 Mar 3;109(8):1643-9. doi: 10.1021/jp045847m.

Abstract

Three new multicoefficient correlation methods (MCCMs) called BMC-QCISD, BMC-CCSD, and BMC-CCSD-C are optimized against 274 data that include atomization energies, electron affinities, ionization potentials, and reaction barrier heights. A new basis set called 6-31B(d) is developed and used as part of the new methods. BMC-QCISD has mean unsigned errors in calculating atomization energies per bond and barrier heights of 0.49 and 0.80 kcal/mol, respectively. BMC-CCSD has mean unsigned errors of 0.42 and 0.71 kcal/mol for the same two quantities. BMC-CCSD-C is an equally effective variant of BMC-CCSD that employs Cartesian rather than spherical harmonic basis sets. The mean unsigned error of BMC-CCSD or BMC-CCSD-C for atomization energies, barrier heights, ionization potentials, and electron affinities is 22% lower than G3SX(MP2) at an order of magnitude less cost for gradients for molecules with 9-13 atoms, and it scales better (N6 vs N,7 where N is the number of atoms) when the size of the molecule is increased.

摘要

三种新的多系数相关方法(MCCMs),即BMC-QCISD、BMC-CCSD和BMC-CCSD-C,针对包括原子化能、电子亲和能、电离势和反应势垒高度在内的274个数据进行了优化。一种名为6-31B(d)的新基组被开发出来,并用作新方法的一部分。BMC-QCISD在计算每个键的原子化能和势垒高度时,平均绝对误差分别为0.49和0.80千卡/摩尔。对于相同的两个量,BMC-CCSD的平均绝对误差为0.42和0.71千卡/摩尔。BMC-CCSD-C是BMC-CCSD的一个同样有效的变体,它采用笛卡尔基组而非球谐基组。对于具有9至13个原子的分子,BMC-CCSD或BMC-CCSD-C在原子化能、势垒高度、电离势和电子亲和能方面的平均绝对误差比G3SX(MP2)低22%,且在计算梯度时成本低一个数量级,并且当分子尺寸增大时,其标度性更好(N6对N7,其中N是原子数)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验