• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护中的预后

Prognosis in critical care.

作者信息

Ohno-Machado Lucila, Resnic Frederic S, Matheny Michael E

机构信息

Decision Systems Group, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2006;8:567-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095842.

DOI:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095842
PMID:16834567
Abstract

Prognostic risk prediction models have been employed in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting since the 1980s and provide health care providers with important information to help inform decisions related to treatment and prognosis, as well as to compare outcomes across institutions. Prognostic models for critical care are among the most widely utilized and tested predictive models in healthcare. In this article, we review and compare mortality prediction models, including the APACHE (1981), SAPS (1984), APACHE-II (1985), MPM (1987), APACHE-III (1991), SAPS-II (1993), and MPM-II (1993). We emphasize the importance of model calibration in this domain. In addition, we present a brief review of the statistical methodology, multiple logistic regression, which underlies most of the models currently used in critical care.

摘要

自20世纪80年代以来,预后风险预测模型已在重症监护病房(ICU)环境中得到应用,为医疗保健提供者提供重要信息,以帮助做出与治疗和预后相关的决策,并比较各机构的治疗结果。重症监护的预后模型是医疗保健领域应用最广泛且经过测试的预测模型之一。在本文中,我们回顾并比较了死亡率预测模型,包括急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE,1981年)、简化急性生理学评分(SAPS,1984年)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统第二版(APACHE-II,1985年)、死亡率预测模型(MPM,1987年)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统第三版(APACHE-III,1991年)、简化急性生理学评分第二版(SAPS-II,1993年)和死亡率预测模型第二版(MPM-II,1993年)。我们强调了模型校准在该领域的重要性。此外,我们简要回顾了作为当前重症监护中大多数模型基础的统计方法——多元逻辑回归。

相似文献

1
Prognosis in critical care.重症监护中的预后
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2006;8:567-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095842.
2
Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.对入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的六种死亡率预测模型的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2003 Oct;7(5):R116-22. doi: 10.1186/cc2373. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
3
[Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II].[比较三种重症监护病房患者严重程度评分系统的性能:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)、简化急性生理学评分系统Ⅱ(SAPS II)、死亡率预测模型Ⅱ(MPM II)]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2005 Aug;38(3):276-82.
4
[Risk predictors, scoring systems and prognostic models in anesthesia and intensive care. Part II. Intensive Care].麻醉与重症监护中的风险预测因素、评分系统及预后模型。第二部分。重症监护
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2002 Oct;37(10):591-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34522.
5
Discovery and inclusion of SOFA score episodes in mortality prediction.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分事件在死亡率预测中的发现与纳入
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6):649-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
6
Caution when using prognostic models: a prospective comparison of 3 recent prognostic models.使用预后模型时需谨慎:3 种近期预后模型的前瞻性比较。
J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):423.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.08.016. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
7
Comparison of newer scoring systems with the conventional scoring systems in general intensive care population.比较新型评分系统与普通重症监护人群中传统评分系统的差异。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Feb;78(2):194-200. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
8
Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom.在英国大型多中心成人普通重症监护病房入院队列中对风险预测模型进行重新校准。
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1378-88. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000216702.94014.75.
9
[Prognostic systems in intensive care: TRISS, SAPS II, APACHE III].[重症监护中的预后系统:创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)、简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统III(APACHE III)]
Minerva Anestesiol. 2001 Jul-Aug;67(7-8):519-38.
10
The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.肺切除术后入住重症监护病房患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III结局预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):832-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Mortality in Medical ICU Patients: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center in Jordan.约旦一家三级医疗中心内科重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测因素:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 7;14(12):4039. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124039.
2
Association of bioimpedance analysis parameters trajectories with clinical outcomes in neurocritical patients.神经重症患者生物电阻抗分析参数轨迹与临床结局的关联
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 13;10(12):e32948. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32948. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
3
Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation.
人工智能算法中的偏差及缓解建议。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jun 22;2(6):e0000278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000278. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Explainable ensemble machine learning model for prediction of 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.用于预测脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤患者28天死亡风险的可解释集成机器学习模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 18;10:1165129. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1165129. eCollection 2023.
5
Association of the time in targeted blood glucose range of 3.9-10 mmol/L with the mortality of critically ill patients with or without diabetes.血糖控制在3.9-10毫摩尔/升目标范围内的时间与有或无糖尿病重症患者死亡率的关联
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 11;9(3):e13662. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13662. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Predicting 30-Day Hospital Readmission Risk in a National Cohort of Patients with Cirrhosis.预测全国肝硬化患者队列30天再入院风险
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Apr;65(4):1003-1031. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05826-w. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
7
A nonparametric updating method to correct clinical prediction model drift.一种修正临床预测模型漂移的非参数更新方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1448-1457. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz127.
8
Are Fetuin-A levels beneficial for estimating timing of sepsis occurrence?胎球蛋白-A水平对评估脓毒症发生时间有帮助吗?
Saudi Med J. 2018 Jul;39(7):679-684. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.7.22418.
9
Calibration Drift Among Regression and Machine Learning Models for Hospital Mortality.用于医院死亡率的回归模型和机器学习模型中的校准漂移
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:625-634. eCollection 2017.
10
Calibration drift in regression and machine learning models for acute kidney injury.急性肾损伤回归模型和机器学习模型中的校准漂移
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1052-1061. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx030.