• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中新世植物化石DNA的扩增与分析。

Amplification and analysis of Miocene plant fossil DNA.

作者信息

Golenberg E M

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991 Sep 30;333(1268):419-26; discussion 426-7. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1991.0092.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.1991.0092
PMID:1684052
Abstract

Ancient DNA has been extracted and sequenced from several animal and plant specimens. Previous considerations of the damage to ancient DNA have suggested that both the age and size of DNA fragments that can be retrieved and sequenced may be limited, the former to between several thousand and at most tens of thousands of years old, and the latter to at most a few hundred bases. A recent report of a 770 base pair (b.p.) sequence from the chloroplast gene rbcL from a Miocene Magnolia latahensis leaf indicates that both estimated limitations may be too conservative. Further work has indicated that analysis of Miocene fossil DNA can be replicated, and can, therefore, open up the prospects for future development of the field of molecular palaeontology. Successful amplification of fossil DNA is sometimes confounded by factors inherent to fossil DNA or to samples with minimal amounts of target DNA. Techniques that alter denaturation, reduce inhibitors and the problem of contaminants, and repair DNA prior to polymerase chain reaction amplification can increase the probability of success.

摘要

已经从多个动植物标本中提取了古代DNA并进行了测序。先前对古代DNA损伤的研究表明,能够被检索和测序的DNA片段的年龄和大小可能都有限制,前者限制在几千年到最多几万年之间,后者最多几百个碱基。最近一份关于来自中新世大叶木兰叶片叶绿体基因rbcL的770个碱基对(bp)序列的报告表明,这两个估计的限制可能都过于保守。进一步的研究表明,对中新世化石DNA的分析可以重复进行,因此可以为分子古生物学领域的未来发展开辟前景。化石DNA的成功扩增有时会受到化石DNA本身或目标DNA含量极少的样本所固有的因素的干扰。改变变性、减少抑制剂和污染物问题以及在聚合酶链反应扩增之前修复DNA的技术可以提高成功的概率。

相似文献

1
Amplification and analysis of Miocene plant fossil DNA.中新世植物化石DNA的扩增与分析。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991 Sep 30;333(1268):419-26; discussion 426-7. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1991.0092.
2
Chloroplast DNA sequence from a miocene Magnolia species.来自中新世木兰属物种的叶绿体DNA序列。
Nature. 1990 Apr 12;344(6267):656-8. doi: 10.1038/344656a0.
3
Amplification and sequencing of DNA from a 120-135-million-year-old weevil.对一只生活在1.2亿至1.35亿年前的象鼻虫的DNA进行扩增和测序。
Nature. 1993 Jun 10;363(6429):536-8. doi: 10.1038/363536a0.
4
An rbcL sequence from a Miocene Taxodium (bald cypress).一个来自中新世落羽杉(秃柏)的核糖体大亚基RNA基因(rbcL)序列。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):449-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.449.
5
DNA sequences from Miocene fossils: an ndhF sequence of Magnolia latahensis (Magnoliaceae) and an rbcL sequence of Persea pseudocarolinensis (Lauraceae).中新世化石的 DNA 序列:木莲(木兰科)的 ndhF 序列和鳄梨(樟科)的 rbcL 序列。
Am J Bot. 2004 Apr;91(4):615-20. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.4.615.
6
Ancient DNA from Polynesian rats: extraction, amplification and sequence from single small bones.来自波利尼西亚鼠的古DNA:从小块单根骨头中提取、扩增及测序
Electrophoresis. 1997 Aug;18(9):1534-7. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150180908.
7
[Amplification of mitochondrial DNA fragments from ancient human teeth and bones].[从古代人类牙齿和骨骼中扩增线粒体DNA片段]
C R Acad Sci III. 1990;310(9):365-70.
8
[A simple and effective method for isolation of DNA from fossil bones for subsequent amplification using the polymerase chain reaction].一种从化石骨骼中分离DNA以用于后续聚合酶链反应扩增的简单有效方法
Genetika. 1993 Apr;29(4):690-3.
9
A blind testing design for authenticating ancient DNA sequences.一种用于验证古代DNA序列的盲测设计。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997 Apr;7(2):261-5. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0398.
10
What does palaeontology contribute to systematics in a molecular world?在分子时代,古生物学对系统学有何贡献?
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Jun;9(3):437-47. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0488.

引用本文的文献

1
Extending the scope of Darwin's 'abominable mystery': integrative approaches to understanding angiosperm origins and species richness.拓展达尔文“可恶的谜团”的范围:综合方法理解被子植物起源和物种丰富度。
Ann Bot. 2018 Jan 25;121(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx109.
2
Toward high-resolution population genomics using archaeological samples.利用考古样本迈向高分辨率群体基因组学。
DNA Res. 2016 Aug;23(4):295-310. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw029. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
3
Novel perspectives in wood certification and forensics: dry wood as a source of DNA.
木材认证与法医学的新视角:干燥木材作为DNA来源
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 22;269(1495):1039-46. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1982.
4
Structural biopolymer preservation in Miocene leaf fossils from the Clarkia site, northern Idaho.爱达荷州北部克拉克亚遗址中新世叶片化石中的结构生物聚合物保存情况。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Mar 15;90(6):2246-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2246.
5
Chloroplast gene sequences and the study of plant evolution.叶绿体基因序列与植物进化研究
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jan 15;90(2):363-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.363.
6
DNA in wheat seeds from European archaeological sites.
Experientia. 1994 Jun 15;50(6):571-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01921727.
7
An rbcL sequence from a Miocene Taxodium (bald cypress).一个来自中新世落羽杉(秃柏)的核糖体大亚基RNA基因(rbcL)序列。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):449-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.449.