Everitt Hazel A, Little Paul S, Smith Peter W F
Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST.
BMJ. 2006 Aug 12;333(7563):321. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38891.551088.7C. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
To assess different management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis.
Open, factorial, randomised controlled trial.
30 general practices in southern England.
307 adults and children with acute infective conjunctivitis.
One of three antibiotic prescribing strategies-immediate antibiotics (chloramphenicol eye drops; n = 104), no antibiotics (controls; n = 94), or delayed antibiotics (n = 109); a patient information leaflet or not; and an eye swab or not.
Severity of symptoms on days 1-3 after consultation, duration of symptoms, and belief in the effectiveness of antibiotics for eye infections.
Prescribing strategies did not affect the severity of symptoms but duration of moderate symptoms was less with antibiotics: no antibiotics (controls) 4.8 days, immediate antibiotics 3.3 days (risk ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 0.8), delayed antibiotics 3.9 days (0.8, 0.7 to 0.9). Compared with no initial offer of antibiotics, antibiotic use was higher in the immediate antibiotic group: controls 30%, immediate antibiotics 99% (odds ratio 185.4, 23.9 to 1439.2), delayed antibiotics 53% (2.9, 1.4 to 5.7), as was belief in the effectiveness of antibiotics: controls 47%, immediate antibiotics 67% (odds ratio 2.4, 1.1 to 5.0), delayed antibiotics 55% (1.4, 0.7 to 3.0), and intention to reattend for eye infections: controls 40%, immediate antibiotics 68% (3.2, 1.6 to 6.4), delayed antibiotics 41% (1.0, 0.5 to 2.0). A patient information leaflet or eye swab had no effect on the main outcomes. Reattendance within two weeks was less in the delayed compared with immediate antibiotic group: 0.3 (0.1 to 1.0) v 0.7 (0.3 to 1.6).
Delayed prescribing of antibiotics is probably the most appropriate strategy for managing acute conjunctivitis in primary care. It reduces antibiotic use, shows no evidence of medicalisation, provides similar duration and severity of symptoms to immediate prescribing, and reduces reattendance for eye infections.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN32956955 [controlled-trials.com].
评估急性感染性结膜炎的不同管理策略。
开放、析因、随机对照试验。
英格兰南部的30家普通诊所。
307例患有急性感染性结膜炎的成人和儿童。
三种抗生素处方策略之一——立即使用抗生素(氯霉素滴眼液;n = 104)、不使用抗生素(对照组;n = 94)或延迟使用抗生素(n = 109);是否提供患者信息手册;是否进行眼拭子检查。
就诊后第1 - 3天的症状严重程度、症状持续时间以及对眼部感染使用抗生素有效性的看法。
处方策略不影响症状严重程度,但使用抗生素时中度症状的持续时间较短:不使用抗生素(对照组)为4.8天,立即使用抗生素为3.3天(风险比0.7,95%置信区间0.6至0.8),延迟使用抗生素为3.9天(0.8,0.7至0.9)。与最初不提供抗生素相比,立即使用抗生素组的抗生素使用率更高:对照组为30%,立即使用抗生素组为99%(优势比185.4,23.9至1439.2),延迟使用抗生素组为53%(2.9,1.4至5.7),对抗生素有效性的看法也是如此:对照组为47%,立即使用抗生素组为67%(优势比2.4,1.1至5.0),延迟使用抗生素组为55%(1.4,0.七岁至3.0),以及因眼部感染再次就诊的意愿:对照组为40%,立即使用抗生素组为68%(3.2,1.6至6.4),延迟使用抗生素组为41%(1.0,0.5至2.0)。患者信息手册或眼拭子检查对主要观察指标无影响。与立即使用抗生素组相比,延迟使用抗生素组在两周内的再次就诊率较低:0.3(0.1至1.0)对0.7(0.3至1.6)。
延迟开具抗生素处方可能是基层医疗中管理急性结膜炎的最合适策略。它减少了抗生素的使用,没有显示出医疗化的迹象,症状持续时间和严重程度与立即开具处方相似,并减少了因眼部感染再次就诊的情况。
当前受控试验ISRCTN32956955 [controlled-trials.com] 。