Suppr超能文献

急性下呼吸道感染的信息手册与抗生素处方策略:一项随机对照试验

Information leaflet and antibiotic prescribing strategies for acute lower respiratory tract infection: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Little Paul, Rumsby Kate, Kelly Joanne, Watson Louise, Moore Michael, Warner Gregory, Fahey Tom, Williamson Ian

机构信息

Primary Medical Care Group, University of Southampton, Highfield, England.

出版信息

JAMA. 2005 Jun 22;293(24):3029-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.24.3029.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Acute lower respiratory tract infection is the most common condition treated in primary care. Many physicians still prescribe antibiotics; however, systematic reviews of the use of antibiotics are small and have diverse conclusions.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effectiveness of 3 prescribing strategies and an information leaflet for acute lower respiratory tract infection.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A randomized controlled trial conducted from August 18, 1998, to July 30, 2003, of 807 patients presenting in a primary care setting with acute uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection. Patients were assigned to 1 of 6 groups by a factorial design: leaflet or no leaflet and 1 of 3 antibiotic groups (immediate antibiotics, no offer of antibiotics, and delayed antibiotics).

INTERVENTION

Three strategies, immediate antibiotics (n = 262), a delayed antibiotic prescription (n = 272), and no offer of antibiotics (n = 273), were prescribed. Approximately half of each group received an information leaflet (129 for immediate antibiotics, 136 for delayed antibiotic prescription, and 140 for no antibiotics).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptom duration and severity.

RESULTS

A total of 562 patients (70%) returned complete diaries and 78 (10%) provided information about both symptom duration and severity. Cough rated at least "a slight problem" lasted a mean of 11.7 days (25% of patients had a cough lasting > or =17 days). An information leaflet had no effect on the main outcomes. Compared with no offer of antibiotics, other strategies did not alter cough duration (delayed, 0.75 days; 95% confidence intervals [CI], -0.37 to 1.88; immediate, 0.11 days; 95% CI, -1.01 to 1.24) or other primary outcomes. Compared with the immediate antibiotic group, slightly fewer patients in the delayed and control groups used antibiotics (96%, 20%, and 16%, respectively; P<.001), fewer patients were "very satisfied" (86%, 77%, and 72%, respectively; P = .005), and fewer patients believed in the effectiveness of antibiotics (75%, 40%, and 47%, respectively; P<.001). There were lower reattendances within a month with antibiotics (mean attendances for no antibiotics, 0.19; delayed, 0.12; and immediate, 0.11; P = .04) and higher attendance with a leaflet (mean attendances for no leaflet, 0.11; and leaflet, 0.17; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

No offer or a delayed offer of antibiotics for acute uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection is acceptable, associated with little difference in symptom resolution, and is likely to considerably reduce antibiotic use and beliefs in the effectiveness of antibiotics.

摘要

背景

急性下呼吸道感染是初级保健中最常见的治疗疾病。许多医生仍会开具抗生素;然而,关于抗生素使用的系统评价规模较小且结论多样。

目的

评估三种处方策略及一份急性下呼吸道感染信息手册的有效性。

设计、地点和患者:1998年8月18日至2003年7月30日在初级保健机构对807例急性单纯性下呼吸道感染患者进行的一项随机对照试验。通过析因设计将患者分为6组中的1组:有或没有信息手册,以及3个抗生素组中的1组(立即使用抗生素、不提供抗生素、延迟使用抗生素)。

干预措施

采用了三种策略,即立即使用抗生素(n = 262)、延迟开具抗生素处方(n = 272)和不提供抗生素(n = 273)。每组中约一半患者收到一份信息手册(立即使用抗生素组129例、延迟开具抗生素处方组136例、不使用抗生素组140例)。

主要观察指标

症状持续时间和严重程度。

结果

共有562例患者(70%)返回了完整的日记,78例(10%)提供了有关症状持续时间和严重程度的信息。被评为至少“有点问题”的咳嗽平均持续11.7天(25%的患者咳嗽持续≥17天)。信息手册对主要观察指标无影响。与不提供抗生素相比,其他策略未改变咳嗽持续时间(延迟使用抗生素组为0.75天;95%置信区间[CI],-0.37至1.88;立即使用抗生素组为0.11天;95%CI,-1.01至1.24)或其他主要观察指标。与立即使用抗生素组相比,延迟使用抗生素组和对照组中使用抗生素的患者略少(分别为96%、20%和16%;P<0.001),“非常满意”的患者较少(分别为86%、77%和72%;P = 0.005),且相信抗生素有效性的患者较少(分别为75%、40%和47%;P<0.001)。使用抗生素的患者在一个月内复诊次数较少(不使用抗生素组的平均复诊次数为0.19;延迟使用抗生素组为0.12;立即使用抗生素组为0.11;P = 0.04),而收到信息手册的患者复诊次数较多(未收到信息手册组的平均复诊次数为0.11;收到信息手册组为0.17;P = 0.02)。

结论

对于急性单纯性下呼吸道感染不提供或延迟提供抗生素是可以接受的,症状缓解方面差异不大,且可能会大幅减少抗生素的使用以及对抗生素有效性的认知。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验