• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对高血压的认知与血压控制之间的关系。

Relationship between physician knowledge of hypertension and blood pressure control.

作者信息

Carter Barry L, Hartz Arthur, Bergus George, Dawson Jeffrey D, Doucette William R, Stewart Janyce J, Xu Yinghui

机构信息

Division of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Jul;8(7):481-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05601.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05601.x
PMID:16849901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8109724/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cross-sectional relationship between physician knowledge of hypertension guidelines and blood pressure (BP) control. The authors evaluated a sample of primary care faculty (n=32) and a sample of their patients (n=613). When treating patients as independent observations, the authors found an inverse relationship (r=-0.524; p=0.002) where higher knowledge scores were associated with lower BP control. The authors conducted a multivariate analysis to accommodate the nonindependence due to random physician effects and found that there was no longer a significant association between knowledge and BP control, but there was still a trend (odds ratio=0.84; p=0.130). This study demonstrates that there is no evidence that high knowledge of hypertension guidelines will improve BP control rates and that higher knowledge may actually be associated with lower BP control. Strategies that are designed only to improve knowledge of hypertension guidelines are insufficient to improve BP control rates.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估医生对高血压指南的了解与血压(BP)控制之间的横断面关系。作者评估了一组初级保健教员样本(n = 32)及其一组患者样本(n = 613)。当将患者作为独立观察对象时,作者发现了一种负相关关系(r = -0.524;p = 0.002),即知识得分越高,血压控制越低。作者进行了多变量分析,以适应由于医生随机效应导致的非独立性,结果发现知识与血压控制之间不再存在显著关联,但仍有趋势(优势比 = 0.84;p = 0.130)。本研究表明,没有证据表明对高血压指南的深入了解会提高血压控制率,而且更高的知识水平实际上可能与更低的血压控制相关。仅旨在提高对高血压指南了解的策略不足以提高血压控制率。

相似文献

1
Relationship between physician knowledge of hypertension and blood pressure control.医生对高血压的认知与血压控制之间的关系。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Jul;8(7):481-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05601.x.
2
Physician reported perception in the treatment of high blood pressure does not correspond to practice.医生报告的高血压治疗认知与实际做法不符。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Apr 2;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-23.
3
Moving beyond guidelines: are report cards the answer to high rates of uncontrolled hypertension?超越指南:成绩单是解决高血压控制率高的答案吗?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2006 Aug;8(4):324-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-006-0072-1.
4
Physician perception of blood pressure control and treatment behavior in high-risk hypertensive patients: a cross-sectional study.高血压高危患者血压控制和治疗行为的医生认知:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024569. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
5
COPD care in Saudi Arabia: physicians' awareness and knowledge of guidelines and barriers to implementation.沙特阿拉伯的慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理:医生对指南的认识、知识及实施障碍
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 May 1;21(5):592-595. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0656.
6
Awareness and knowledge of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: results of a repeat, international, cross-sectional survey.腹内高压和腹腔间隔室综合征的认知与知识:一项重复的国际横断面调查结果
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(3):186-199. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.87648.
7
Changes in blood-pressure control among patients with hypertension from 2008 through 2011: surveys of actual clinical practice.2008年至2011年高血压患者血压控制情况的变化:实际临床实践调查
J Nippon Med Sch. 2014;81(4):258-63. doi: 10.1272/jnms.81.258.
8
Blood pressure control and physician management of hypertension in hospital hypertension units in Spain.西班牙医院高血压科室的血压控制及高血压的医生管理
Hypertension. 2004 Jun;43(6):1338-44. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000127424.59774.84. Epub 2004 Apr 26.
9
Effect of physicians' knowledge on antibiotics rational use in China's county hospitals.医生知识对中国县级医院抗生素合理使用的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;224:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.049. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
[Physician factors associated with the blood pressure control among hypertensive patients].[高血压患者血压控制相关的医生因素]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2007 Nov;40(6):487-94. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.6.487.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of two methods of teaching hypertension in under graduate medical students: "planned lecture" versus "cooperative learning".本科医学生高血压两种教学方法的比较:“计划讲座”与“合作学习”
Nephrourol Mon. 2012 Spring;4(2):478-81. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.4103. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
2
Using an established telehealth model to train urban primary care providers on hypertension management.利用已建立的远程医疗模式培训城市初级保健提供者进行高血压管理。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Jan;14(1):45-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00559.x. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
3
Part II, provider perspectives: should patients be activated to request evidence-based medicine? A qualitative study of the VA project to implement diuretics (VAPID).第二部分,提供者视角:是否应该让患者积极要求循证医学?对 VA 实施利尿剂项目(VAPID)的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2010 Mar 18;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-24.
4
Deterioration of blood pressure control after discontinuation of a physician-pharmacist collaborative intervention.停止医生-药剂师合作干预后血压控制的恶化。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Mar;30(3):228-35. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.3.228.
5
A cluster randomized trial to evaluate physician/pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.一项评估医生/药剂师合作以改善血压控制的整群随机试验。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Apr;10(4):260-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07434.x.
6
Patient and provider perceptions of hypertension treatment: do they agree?患者与医疗服务提供者对高血压治疗的看法:他们的看法一致吗?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Jun;9(6):416-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06492.x.
7
Antihypertensive prescribing: do we have reason to celebrate?抗高血压药物处方:我们有理由庆祝吗?
Hypertension. 2006 Nov;48(5):816-7. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000240978.77934.3a. Epub 2006 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving adherence to guidelines for hypertension drug prescribing: cluster-randomized controlled trial of general versus patient-specific recommendations.提高高血压药物处方指南的依从性:针对一般建议与针对患者的特定建议的整群随机对照试验。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Nov;11(11):677-85.
2
Resistant hypertension revisited: a comparison of two university-based cohorts.难治性高血压再探讨:两个大学队列的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 2005 May;18(5 Pt 1):619-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.11.021.
3
Nurse management for hypertension. A systems approach.高血压的护士管理:一种系统方法。
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Oct;17(10):921-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.006.
4
Measuring adherence to practice guidelines for the management of hypertension: an evaluation of the literature.衡量高血压管理实践指南的依从性:文献评估
Hypertension. 2004 Nov;44(5):602-8. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000144100.29945.5e. Epub 2004 Sep 20.
5
The burden of adult hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: a rising tide.1999年至2000年美国成人高血压负担:呈上升趋势。
Hypertension. 2004 Oct;44(4):398-404. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000142248.54761.56. Epub 2004 Aug 23.
6
Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000.1988 - 2000年美国高血压的患病率、知晓率、治疗率及控制率趋势
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):199-206. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.199.
7
Physician-pharmacist comanagement of hypertension: a randomized, comparative trial.高血压的医生-药剂师共同管理:一项随机对照试验。
Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Feb;23(2):209-16. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.2.209.32096.
8
How pharmacists can assist physicians with controlling blood pressure.药剂师如何协助医生控制血压。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):31-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01460.x.
9
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.改善慢性病患者的初级保健:慢性病照护模式,第2部分。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1909.
10
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness.改善慢性病患者的初级护理。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775.