• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策平衡量表中文版:进一步验证

The chinese version of the decisional balance scale: further validation.

作者信息

Chen Huey-Shys, Sheu Jiunn-Jye, Percy Melanie S, Brown Emma J, Yang Rea-Jane

机构信息

College of Health and Public Affairs, School of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 38216-2210, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2006 Jul-Aug;55(4):225-30. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200607000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00006199-200607000-00002
PMID:16849974
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the Decisional Balance Scale (DBS) has been established to have sound psychometric properties, the reliability and validity of this instrument have not been evaluated in different populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to conduct psychometric validations for the Chinese version of the DBS (CDBS).

METHODS

This research project was designed as a descriptive cross-sectional study. The CDBS was administered to children in Grades 5-9 (ages 11-17 years, n = 952) recruited from elementary and junior high schools in northern Taiwan. A random cluster sampling method was used.

RESULTS

The pros and cons subscales were supported by Cronbach's alpha coefficients of .88 and .85, respectively. Item-to-subtotal correlation coefficients for the subscales were above .48. The results from confirmatory factor analysis, used to assess the construct validity of the CDBS, indicated that the two-factor structure was the best fit for the CDBS when it was used with Taiwanese adolescents (comparative fit index = .96). The contrasted group approach affirmed the construct validity of the pros and the cons of the CDBS. The validity and reliability of the CDBS were supported by the psychometric test results of this study.

DISCUSSION

The CDBS is congruent with the culture of Taiwanese adolescents. However, to expand the usefulness of this tool across cultures, the CDBS should continue to be tested with other Chinese-speaking populations and settings.

摘要

背景

尽管决策平衡量表(DBS)已被证实具有良好的心理测量学特性,但该工具在不同人群中的信效度尚未得到评估。

目的

本研究旨在对中文版决策平衡量表(CDBS)进行心理测量学验证。

方法

本研究项目设计为描述性横断面研究。采用随机整群抽样方法,对从台湾北部中小学招募的5至9年级儿童(年龄11至17岁,n = 952)施测CDBS。

结果

利弊分量表的克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.88和0.85。分量表的项目与总分相关系数均高于0.48。用于评估CDBS结构效度的验证性因素分析结果表明,当CDBS用于台湾青少年时,两因素结构最适合该量表(比较拟合指数 = 0.96)。对比组方法证实了CDBS利弊方面的结构效度。本研究的心理测量学测试结果支持了CDBS的效度和信度。

讨论

CDBS与台湾青少年的文化相符。然而,为了在不同文化中扩大该工具的实用性,CDBS应继续在其他华语人群和环境中进行测试。

相似文献

1
The chinese version of the decisional balance scale: further validation.决策平衡量表中文版:进一步验证
Nurs Res. 2006 Jul-Aug;55(4):225-30. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200607000-00002.
2
Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Decisional Balance Scale (CDBS).中文版决策平衡量表(CDBS)的心理测量测试。
Health Educ Behav. 2006 Dec;33(6):812-20. doi: 10.1177/1090198105282411. Epub 2006 May 31.
3
Cross-cultural validation of the stages of the tobacco acquisition questionnaire and the decisional balance scale.烟草获取问卷阶段和决策平衡量表的跨文化验证
Res Nurs Health. 2003 Jun;26(3):233-43. doi: 10.1002/nur.10082.
4
Psychometric characteristics of the parsimonious Chinese version of the Smoking Self-Efficacy Survey (CSSES-20).简约中文版吸烟自我效能调查(CSSES-20)的心理测量学特征。
J Sch Health. 2010 May;80(5):259-64; quiz 265-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00497.x.
5
Factor structure of decisional balance and temptations scales for smoking: cross-validation in urban female African-American adolescents.吸烟决策平衡和诱惑量表的因子结构:城市女性非裔美国青少年的交叉验证。
Int J Behav Med. 2012 Jun;19(2):217-27. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9145-x.
6
Translation and validation of Taiwan Chinese version of the self-regulation questionnaire for gynecologic cancer survivors.妇科癌症幸存者自我调节问卷的台湾中文版本的翻译和验证。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;58(5):614-620. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.05.032.
7
Chinese Version of Psychometric Evaluation of Self-Reflection and Insight Scale on Taiwanese Nursing Students.台湾护理学生自我反思与洞察量表的心理测量评估中文版
J Nurs Res. 2016 Dec;24(4):337-346. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000132.
8
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Spiritual Index of Well-Being in elderly Taiwanese.台湾老年人幸福感精神指数中文版的心理测量特性。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 4;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0392-1.
9
Decisional Balance Inventory (DBI) Adolescent Form for Smoking: Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version.吸烟决策平衡量表青少年版(DBI):波斯语版本的心理测量特性
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4425-2.
10
Sexual function in cervical cancer patients: Psychometric properties and performance of a Chinese version of the Female Sexual Function Index.宫颈癌患者的性功能:中文版女性性功能指数的心理测量特性及表现
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Malay Version of the Decisional Balance Inventory (MDBI) among secondary school-going adolescents.马来文版决策平衡量表(MDBI)在中学生中的效度验证。
Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Sep 19;20:79. doi: 10.18332/tid/152409. eCollection 2022.
2
Decisional Balance Inventory (DBI) Adolescent Form for Smoking: Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version.吸烟决策平衡量表青少年版(DBI):波斯语版本的心理测量特性
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4425-2.