• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科癌症幸存者自我调节问卷的台湾中文版本的翻译和验证。

Translation and validation of Taiwan Chinese version of the self-regulation questionnaire for gynecologic cancer survivors.

机构信息

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dayeh University, Changhua, Taiwan; Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Department of Nursing, Dayeh University, Changhua, Taiwan.

出版信息

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;58(5):614-620. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.05.032.

DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2019.05.032
PMID:31542081
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To culturally adapt the self-regulation questionnaire to the Taiwan Chinese version (TC-SRQ) and to evaluate its psychometric properties for gynecologic cancer survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was employed with a purposive sample of 287 gynecologic cancer survivors. The TC-SRQ was adapted from a Germany version through back-translation to ensure its quality. For construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess the TC-SRQ measurement model with fit indexes including the χ test, the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and the normed fit index (NFI), the comparative fit index (CFI), and non-normed fit indices (NNFI). For concurrent validity, the Taiwanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's 30-item core quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire was used as a criterion measure for quality of life (QOL). Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

For a modified measurement model of TC-SRQ, the model fit (χ = 311.23, P = .0; RMSEA = .088; NFI = .97, CFI = .98, NNFI = .97) was acceptable. The evidence of construct validity of TC-SRQ scale was confirmed by the model estimates. TC-SRQ correlated positively with the global QOL, physical, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning domains, and negatively with fatigue and pain domains of EORTC QLQ-C30. For known groups validity, TC-SRQ was correlated with groups attributed by age, family support, health status, and sleep quality. A Cronbach's α of .91 indicated good internal consistency; the test-retest reliability was .82.

CONCLUSIONS

TC-SRQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing self-regulation in gynecologic cancer survivors.

摘要

目的

将自我调节问卷文化适应为繁体中文版(TC-SRQ),并评估其在妇科癌症幸存者中的心理测量特性。

材料与方法

采用横断面研究,对 287 名妇科癌症幸存者进行了目的性抽样。TC-SRQ 是通过回译从德国版本改编而来,以确保其质量。为了评估结构效度,采用验证性因子分析(CFA)来评估 TC-SRQ 的测量模型,拟合指标包括 χ²检验、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)和标准化拟合指数(NFI)、比较拟合指数(CFI)和非标准化拟合指数(NNFI)。为了评估同时效度,采用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的 30 项核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)的繁体中文版作为生活质量(QOL)的标准衡量标准。信度通过内部一致性和重测信度进行评估。

结果

对于 TC-SRQ 的修正测量模型,模型拟合(χ²=311.23,P=.0;RMSEA=.088;NFI=.97,CFI=.98,NNFI=.97)是可以接受的。TC-SRQ 量表的结构效度证据得到了模型估计的证实。TC-SRQ 与全球 QOL、身体、认知、情感和社会功能领域呈正相关,与 EORTC QLQ-C30 的疲劳和疼痛领域呈负相关。在已知组有效性方面,TC-SRQ 与年龄、家庭支持、健康状况和睡眠质量等因素相关。Cronbach's α 为.91,表明内部一致性良好;重测信度为.82。

结论

TC-SRQ 是评估妇科癌症幸存者自我调节的有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Translation and validation of Taiwan Chinese version of the self-regulation questionnaire for gynecologic cancer survivors.妇科癌症幸存者自我调节问卷的台湾中文版本的翻译和验证。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;58(5):614-620. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.05.032.
2
Chinese Version of the Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale for Gynecological Cancer Survivors: A Psychometric Study in Taiwan.中文版妇科癌症幸存者生存顾虑评估量表:台湾的心理计量学研究。
J Nurs Res. 2019 Oct;27(5):e41. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000323.
3
Psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Uganda.《EORTC QLQ-C30 在乌干达的心理测量特性》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01769-x.
4
Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL among cancer patients in Jordan.约旦癌症患者中欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷C15-PAL阿拉伯语版的心理测量学特性
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun;24(6):2455-62. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-3018-9. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Gratitude at Work Scale in Employed Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作感恩量表中文版在在职护士中的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Res. 2024 Aug 1;32(4):e336. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000620.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者中文版匹兹堡疲劳量表的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 12;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01815-8.
8
Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Breast Cancer Survivor Self-efficacy Scale in China.中文版乳腺癌幸存者自我效能量表在中国的翻译、效度和信度。
Cancer Nurs. 2019 Sep/Oct;42(5):E31-E40. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000637.
9
Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients.中文版晚期癌症患者舒缓护理问题和需求问卷简表的心理计量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 6;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0450-5.
10
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Quality OF Life Radiation Therapy Instrument and the Head & Neck Module (QOL-RTI/H&N).生活质量放疗工具中文版(QOL-RTI/H&N)的翻译和验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 14;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Digital Technology as a Collaborative Tool among Nursing Students-Survey Study and Validation.数字技术在护生协作中的应用——调查研究与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 1;19(21):14267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114267.
2
Competence and Attitude of Family Physicians towards Sexuality Regarding Their Sexual Orientation, Age, or Having a Partner-Survey Study and Validation.家庭医生在性取向、年龄或是否有伴侣方面的性知识和态度:调查研究和验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 3;19(17):11029. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711029.
3
Consumers' Attitude towards Sustainability in Italy: Process of Validation of a Duly Designed Questionnaire.
意大利消费者对可持续发展的态度:一份精心设计问卷的验证过程
Foods. 2022 Aug 30;11(17):2629. doi: 10.3390/foods11172629.
4
The Perimenopausal Fatigue Self-Management Scale Is Suitable for Evaluating Perimenopausal Taiwanese Women's Vulnerability to Fatigue Syndrome.围绝经期疲劳自我管理量表适用于评估台湾围绝经期女性患疲劳综合征的易感性。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 16;9(3):336. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030336.
5
Validation of a Questionnaire Developed to Evaluate a Pediatric eHealth Website for Parents.验证一个为家长开发的评估儿科电子健康网站的问卷。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 13;17(8):2671. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082671.