Kaufman Sharon R, Shim Janet K, Russ Ann J
Institute for Health and Aging, Box 0646, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0646, USA.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Jul;61(4):S175-84. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.4.s175.
This qualitative, ethnographic study explores the character and extent of medical choice for life-extending procedures on older adults. It examines the sociomedical features of treatment that shape health care provider understandings of the nature of choice, and it illustrates the effects of treatment patterns on patients' perspectives of their options for life extension.
By using participant observation in outpatient clinics and face-to-face interviews, we spoke with a convenience sample of 38 health professionals and 132 patients aged 70 or older who had undergone life-extending medical procedures. We asked providers and patients open-ended questions about their understandings of medical choice for cardiac procedures, dialysis, and kidney transplant.
Neither patients nor health professionals made choices about the start or continuation of life-extending interventions that were uninformed by the routine pathways of treatment; the pressures of the technological imperative; or the growing normalization, ease, and safety of treating ever older patients. We found a difference among cardiac, dialysis, and transplant procedures regarding the locus of responsibility for maintaining and extending life.
Provider and patient practices together reveal how the standard use of medical procedures at ever older ages trumps patient-initiated decision making.
这项定性的人种志研究探讨了老年人延长生命治疗手段的医疗选择特点及程度。它考察了塑造医疗服务提供者对选择本质理解的治疗社会医学特征,并阐明了治疗模式对患者延长生命选择观点的影响。
通过在门诊进行参与观察以及面对面访谈,我们与38名医疗专业人员和132名70岁及以上接受过延长生命医疗程序的患者组成的便利样本进行了交谈。我们向医疗服务提供者和患者提出了关于他们对心脏手术、透析和肾移植医疗选择理解的开放式问题。
患者和医疗专业人员都没有在不考虑常规治疗途径、技术必要性压力或治疗老年患者日益常态化、便捷性和安全性的情况下,对延长生命干预措施的开始或继续做出选择。我们发现心脏手术、透析和移植手术在维持和延长生命的责任归属方面存在差异。
医疗服务提供者和患者的行为共同揭示了在老年人中医疗程序的标准使用如何胜过患者发起的决策。