Med Anthropol. 2009 Oct;28(4):317-25. doi: 10.1080/01459740903303852.
An aging society, a growing array of life-extending medical interventions, Medicare policy, and an ethic of individual decision making together contribute to the deepening societal tension in the United States between controlling health care costs and enabling health consumer use of life-sustaining technologies. The activities that constitute longevity making, like so many other sociomedical practices, comprise a site for the governing of life and the emergence of new forms of ethical comportment and social participation. Those activities--including the necessity of treating risk, the difficulty of saying "no" to evidence-based interventions, and the responsibility of choosing among clinical options--also lie at the heart of debates about health care rationing and reform. Cardiac procedures, organ transplantation, and cancer treatments are three examples of medicine's success in extending life and are emblematic of the existential and societal quandaries that result. A perspective from medical anthropology shows the ways in which the making of life is linked to health care spending and the ongoing debates about age-based rationing.
老龄化社会、日益增多的延长寿命的医疗干预措施、医疗保险政策以及个人决策伦理共同导致了美国在控制医疗保健成本和使医疗消费者能够使用维持生命的技术之间的社会紧张局势不断加深。构成长寿的活动,就像许多其他社会医学实践一样,构成了生命治理的场所,出现了新的伦理行为和社会参与形式。这些活动——包括治疗风险的必要性、对基于证据的干预措施说“不”的困难,以及在临床选择中做出选择的责任——也是医疗保健配给和改革辩论的核心。心脏手术、器官移植和癌症治疗是医学成功延长生命的三个例子,也是由此产生的存在和社会困境的象征。医学人类学的观点表明了生命的创造与医疗保健支出以及关于基于年龄的配给的持续辩论之间的联系。