Suppr超能文献

使用部分相干干涉测量法在生理条件下测量的人工晶状体调节和假性调节。

Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry.

作者信息

Tsorbatzoglou Alexis, Németh Gábor, Máth János, Berta András

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Aug;32(8):1345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.069.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To distinguish pseudophakic accommodation from pseudoaccommodation by measuring the physiologically and pharmacologically induced anterior chamber depth (ACD) shifts.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

METHODS

This study comprised 100 pseudophakic eyes of 79 patients. Forty patients (Group 1) received the AcrySof MA60AC intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories), 50 patients (Group 2) received the SA60AT IOL (Alcon Laboratories), and 10 patients (Group 3) received the apodized diffractive SA60D3 ReSTOR IOL. Visual function was evaluated a mean of 10.2 months +/- 9.2 (SD) postoperatively, and the total pseudoaccommodative amplitude was determined with a defocusing technique. To distinguish pseudophakic accommodation from pseudoaccommodation, ACD measurements were performed using partial coherence interferometry during distance fixation and physiologic accommodation after pharmacologic relaxation of the ciliary muscle.

RESULTS

Best corrected distance and near visual acuities were similar in the 3 groups (P = .75 and P = .08, respectively). Distance corrected near visual acuity was significantly better in Group 3 (P < .001), with all eyes achieving J1 or better. Three percent in Group 1 and 8% in Group 2 achieved J1 or better. Subjective accommodation was similar in Groups 1 and 2 (-0.82 +/- 0.18 diopter [D] and -1.00 +/- 0.35 D, respectively; P = .3). Group 3 had an accommodation curve with 2 peaks. Intraocular lens movement differences between the groups were not significant (physiologic stimulus: P = .07; cyclopentolate: P = .46), and significant ACD shifts from baseline were not detected (physiologic stimulus: P = .14; cyclopentolate: P = .10).

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudoaccommodative amplitude of the investigated monofocal IOLs was independent of IOL movement. Anterior shift did not affect good near visual acuity with the AcrySof ReSTOR IOL.

摘要

目的

通过测量生理和药物诱导的前房深度(ACD)变化来区分人工晶状体眼的调节与假调节。

设置

匈牙利德布勒森大学眼科。

方法

本研究纳入了79例患者的100只人工晶状体眼。40例患者(第1组)植入了AcrySof MA60AC人工晶状体(爱尔康实验室),50例患者(第2组)植入了SA60AT人工晶状体(爱尔康实验室),10例患者(第3组)植入了变迹衍射SA60D3 ReSTOR人工晶状体。术后平均10.2个月±9.2(标准差)评估视觉功能,并用散焦技术测定总的假调节幅度。为区分人工晶状体眼的调节与假调节,在睫状肌药物松弛后的远距离注视和生理调节期间,使用部分相干干涉测量法进行ACD测量。

结果

3组的最佳矫正远视力和近视力相似(分别为P = 0.75和P = 0.08)。第3组的距离矫正近视力明显更好(P < 0.001),所有眼均达到J1或更好。第1组3%和第2组8%达到J1或更好。第1组和第2组的主观调节相似(分别为-0.82±0.18屈光度[D]和-1.00±0.35 D;P = 0.3)。第3组有一条有2个峰值的调节曲线。各组之间的人工晶状体移动差异不显著(生理刺激:P = 0.07;环喷托酯:P = 0.46),未检测到与基线相比显著的ACD变化(生理刺激:P = 0.14;环喷托酯:P = 0.10)。

结论

所研究的单焦点人工晶状体的假调节幅度与人工晶状体移动无关。前房前移并不影响使用AcrySof ReSTOR人工晶状体时良好的近视力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验