Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Cash Kim A, Pampati Vidyasagar, McManus Carla D, Damron Kim S
Pain Management Center of Paducah, 2831 Lone Oak Road, Paducah, Kentucky 2003, USA.
Pain Physician. 2004 Jan;7(1):81-92.
To evaluate accuracy of needle placement and flow patterns of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections.
A prospective observational study of patients with low back pain undergoing caudal epidural injections under fluoroscopy.
Epidural administration of corticosteroids is one of the commonly used interventions in managing chronic low back pain. Sacral or caudal epidural placement of the needle is one of the commonly used means to access the lumbar epidural space for administration of various drugs.
A total of 100 consecutive patients underwent fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. Needle insertion was performed blindly (without the use of fluoroscopic guidance) based on palpable landmarks, palpation of subcutaneous airflow, subjective impression that the needle was in a satisfactory position, and ease of injection of contrast. These clinical criteria were compared with the position of the needle as seen under fluoroscopy and the spread of radiopaque contrast in the epidural space. The contrast flow patterns, ventral or dorsal epidural filling, nerve root filling, and correlation of filling to the side of pain were evaluated.
Successful injection placement without fluoroscopic visualization was confirmed on subsequent fluoroscopic visualization in 77% of the patients. Various filling and flow patterns showed that with injection of 10 mL of contrast, filling was noted up to S1 in 70% of the patients, followed by L5 nerve root filling in 12% of the patients. Ventral epidural filling was seen in 69% of the patients, in contrast to dorsal filling in 92% of the patients. Nerve root filling correlated with leg pain in only 43% of the patients. Intravenous placement of the needle was noted in 14% of the patients with positive flashback and aspiration in 50% of the patients.
Caudal epidural injections are ideally performed with fluoroscopic guidance as the gold standard for accurate needle placement. However, this does not assure either targeted delivery or accurate placement of the drug.
评估在透视引导下进行骶管硬膜外注射时穿刺针的放置准确性及血流模式。
一项对在透视引导下接受骶管硬膜外注射的腰痛患者进行的前瞻性观察研究。
硬膜外注射皮质类固醇是治疗慢性腰痛常用的干预措施之一。骶管或尾端硬膜外穿刺针放置是进入腰椎硬膜外间隙给予各种药物常用的方法之一。
总共100例连续患者接受了透视引导下的骶管硬膜外注射。穿刺针基于可触及的标志、皮下气流的触诊、穿刺针处于满意位置的主观感觉以及造影剂注射的难易程度进行盲穿(不使用透视引导)。将这些临床标准与透视下所见穿刺针位置以及不透射线造影剂在硬膜外间隙的扩散情况进行比较。评估造影剂的血流模式、硬膜前或硬膜后填充、神经根填充以及填充与疼痛侧的相关性。
在后续透视检查中,77%的患者在未进行透视可视化的情况下成功进行了注射定位。各种填充和血流模式显示,注射10 mL造影剂时,70%的患者造影剂填充至S1水平,随后12%的患者L5神经根被填充。69%的患者可见硬膜前填充,相比之下,92%的患者可见硬膜后填充。仅43%的患者神经根填充与腿痛相关。14%出现回血的患者穿刺针进入了静脉,50%的患者存在抽吸现象。
骶管硬膜外注射理想情况下应以透视引导作为准确穿刺针放置的金标准来进行。然而,这并不能确保药物的靶向递送或准确放置。