Fortes-Ferreira Lina, Peiró José M, González-Morales M Gloria, Martín Isabel
University of Valencia, Spain.
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Aug;47(4):293-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00519.x.
The purpose of the present study is to analyze the roles of direct action coping and palliative coping in the relationship between work stressors and psychological well-being, as well as their possible interactions, in a sample of 464 bank employees. Hierarchical regression analyses showed main effects of direct action coping on well-being. Palliative coping predicts higher levels of psychological distress. Contrary to what was expected, the interactions between work stressors and direct action coping were not significant. Palliative coping interacted with work stressors when predicting psychosomatic complaints. The interaction between the two types of coping was significant on psychosomatic complaints and psychological distress, but not on job satisfaction. The paper discusses theoretical and practical implications of these results, in order to design intervention strategies to prevent and manage job stress.
本研究旨在分析464名银行员工样本中，直接行动应对和姑息性应对在工作压力源与心理健康关系中的作用，以及它们可能的相互作用。分层回归分析显示直接行动应对对幸福感有主效应。姑息性应对预示着更高水平的心理困扰。与预期相反，工作压力源与直接行动应对之间的相互作用并不显著。在预测心身症状时，姑息性应对与工作压力源存在相互作用。两种应对方式之间的相互作用在心身症状和心理困扰方面显著，但在工作满意度方面不显著。本文讨论了这些结果的理论和实践意义，以便设计预防和管理工作压力的干预策略。
