Suppr超能文献

雷诺嗪联合氨氯地平治疗时的抗心绞痛疗效:ERICA(雷诺嗪治疗慢性心绞痛的疗效)试验

Antianginal efficacy of ranolazine when added to treatment with amlodipine: the ERICA (Efficacy of Ranolazine in Chronic Angina) trial.

作者信息

Stone Peter H, Gratsiansky Nikolay A, Blokhin Alexey, Huang I-Zu, Meng Lixin

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Aug 1;48(3):566-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.044. Epub 2006 Jun 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine if ranolazine improves angina in stable coronary patients with persisting symptoms despite maximum recommended dose of amlodipine.

BACKGROUND

Ranolazine is a unique antianginal agent that has been effective in stable angina, but it has not been studied in the setting of maximum recommended doses of conventional antianginal agents.

METHODS

Stable patients with coronary disease and > or =3 anginal attacks per week despite maximum recommended dosage of amlodipine (10 mg/day) were randomized to 1,000 mg ranolazine or placebo twice a day for 6 weeks. Primary end point was the frequency of angina episodes per week during the double-blind treatment phase. Efficacy was also assessed by nitroglycerin consumption per week and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Adjustment for multiple testing of secondary end points used a hierarchic closed testing procedure. Efficacy was assessed in subgroups based on baseline angina frequency, concomitant long-acting nitrate use, gender, and age. Safety was assessed by adverse events and electrocardiogram evaluations.

RESULTS

A total of 565 patients were randomized: 281 patients to ranolazine and 284 patients to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. At baseline, angina frequency averaged 5.63 +/- 0.18 episodes/week, and nitroglycerin consumption averaged 4.72 +/- 0.21 tablets/week. Compared with placebo, ranolazine significantly reduced frequency of angina episodes (2.88 +/- 0.19 on ranolazine vs. 3.31 +/- 0.22 on placebo; p = 0.028) and nitroglycerin consumption (2.03 +/- 0.20 on ranolazine vs. 2.68 +/- 0.22; p = 0.014), with treatment effect that appeared consistent across subgroups. The median angina weekly episode rate at baseline was 4.5 per week. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant reductions of angina frequency, nitroglycerin use, and SAQ angina frequency for patients with a baseline frequency >4.5 per week but only of angina frequency for those with baseline frequency < or =4.5 per week. Patients with more frequent angina appeared to have a more pronounced treatment effect. No hemodynamic changes were observed. Ranolazine was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranolazine significantly reduced frequency of angina and nitroglycerin consumption compared with placebo and was well tolerated. (The ERICA [Efficacy of Ranolazine In Chronic Angina] Trial; http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00091429).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定雷诺嗪对于尽管已服用氨氯地平最大推荐剂量但仍有持续症状的稳定型冠心病患者是否能改善心绞痛症状。

背景

雷诺嗪是一种独特的抗心绞痛药物,已被证明对稳定型心绞痛有效,但尚未在常规抗心绞痛药物最大推荐剂量的情况下进行研究。

方法

尽管已服用氨氯地平最大推荐剂量(10毫克/天),但仍患有冠心病且每周有≥3次心绞痛发作的稳定型患者被随机分为两组,一组每日两次服用1000毫克雷诺嗪,另一组每日两次服用安慰剂,为期6周。主要终点是双盲治疗阶段每周心绞痛发作的频率。还通过每周硝酸甘油消耗量和西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)评估疗效。对次要终点进行多重检验的调整采用分层封闭式检验程序。根据基线心绞痛频率、是否同时使用长效硝酸盐、性别和年龄对亚组进行疗效评估。通过不良事件和心电图评估来评估安全性。

结果

共有565名患者被随机分组:281名患者服用雷诺嗪,284名患者服用安慰剂。治疗组之间的基线特征相似。基线时,心绞痛频率平均为5.63±0.18次/周,硝酸甘油消耗量平均为4.72±0.21片/周。与安慰剂相比,雷诺嗪显著降低了心绞痛发作频率(服用雷诺嗪组为2.88±0.19次/周,服用安慰剂组为3.31±0.22次/周;p = 0.028)和硝酸甘油消耗量(服用雷诺嗪组为2.03±0.20片/周,服用安慰剂组为2.68±0.22片/周;p = 0.014),且治疗效果在各亚组中似乎一致。基线时每周心绞痛发作的中位数为4.5次/周。亚组分析显示,基线频率>4.5次/周的患者,心绞痛频率、硝酸甘油使用量和SAQ心绞痛频率在统计学上有显著降低;而基线频率≤4.5次/周的患者,仅心绞痛频率有降低。心绞痛发作更频繁的患者似乎治疗效果更明显。未观察到血流动力学变化。雷诺嗪耐受性良好。

结论

与安慰剂相比,雷诺嗪显著降低了心绞痛频率和硝酸甘油消耗量,且耐受性良好。(ERICA[雷诺嗪治疗慢性心绞痛的疗效]试验;http://clinicaltrials.gov;NCT00091429)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验