DiLillo David, Fortier Michelle A, Hayes Sarah A, Trask Emily, Perry Andrea R, Messman-Moore Terri, Fauchier Angèle, Nash Cindy
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68588-0308, USA.
Assessment. 2006 Sep;13(3):297-312. doi: 10.1177/1073191106288391.
This study compared retrospective reports of childhood sexual and physical abuse as assessed by two measures: the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), which uses a Likert-type scaling approach, and the Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventory (CAMI), which employs a behaviorally specific means of assessment. Participants included 1,195 undergraduate students recruited from three geographically diverse universities. Agreement was high across the two measures in the classification of victim status (92% and 80% for sexual and physical abuse, respectively). However, the CTQ classified more participants as sexually abused than did the CAMI, whereas the opposite trend was found for physical abuse. For child physical abuse, many participants reporting abusive acts on the CAMI scored below the cut-point for physical abuse on the CTQ. Classification differences for both types of abuse were largely unrelated to demographic factors, socially desirable responding, or self-reported withholding of information. The implications of these results are discussed in light of future research using retrospective methods of assessing childhood abuse.
童年创伤问卷(CTQ),它采用李克特式量表法;以及计算机辅助虐待量表(CAMI),它采用行为特异性评估方法。参与者包括从三所地理位置不同的大学招募的1195名本科生。在受害者状态分类方面,两种测量方法的一致性很高(性虐待和身体虐待分别为92%和80%)。然而,CTQ将更多参与者分类为遭受性虐待,而CAMI则相反,对于身体虐待,情况则相反。对于儿童身体虐待,许多在CAMI上报告有虐待行为的参与者在CTQ上的身体虐待得分低于临界值。两种类型虐待的分类差异在很大程度上与人口统计学因素、社会期望反应或自我报告的信息隐瞒无关。根据未来使用回顾性方法评估童年虐待的研究,讨论了这些结果的意义。