Suppr超能文献

在弱势患者中采用改良的知情同意程序:一项描述性研究。

Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.

作者信息

Sudore Rebecca L, Landefeld C Seth, Williams Brie A, Barnes Deborah E, Lindquist Karla, Schillinger Dean

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):867-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00535.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about patient characteristics associated with comprehension of consent information, and whether modifications to the consent process can promote understanding.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a modified research consent process, and determine whether literacy and demographic characteristics are associated with understanding consent information.

DESIGN

Descriptive study of a modified consent process: consent form (written at a sixth-grade level) read to participants, combined with 7 comprehension questions and targeted education, repeated until comprehension achieved (teach-to-goal).

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and four ethnically diverse subjects, aged > or = 50, consenting for a trial to improve the forms used for advance directives.

MEASUREMENTS

Number of passes through the consent process required to achieve complete comprehension. Literacy assessed in English and Spanish with the Short Form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (scores 0 to 36).

RESULTS

Participants had a mean age of 61 years and 40% had limited literacy (s-TOHFLA<23). Only 28% of subjects answered all comprehension questions correctly on the first pass. After adjustment, lower literacy (P=.04) and being black (P=.03) were associated with requiring more passes through the consent process. Not speaking English as a primary language was associated with requiring more passes through the consent process in bivariate analyses (P<.01), but not in multivariable analyses (P>.05). After the second pass, most subjects (80%) answered all questions correctly. With a teach-to-goal strategy, 98% of participants who engaged in the consent process achieved complete comprehension.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower literacy and minority status are important determinants of understanding consent information. Using a modified consent process, little additional education was required to achieve complete comprehension, regardless of literacy or language barriers.

摘要

背景

关于与同意信息理解相关的患者特征,以及同意过程的修改是否能促进理解,我们所知甚少。

目的

描述一种修改后的研究同意过程,并确定读写能力和人口统计学特征是否与同意信息的理解相关。

设计

对修改后的同意过程进行描述性研究:向参与者宣读同意书(六年级水平的书面材料),并结合7个理解问题和针对性教育,重复进行直至理解(教到目标达成)。

参与者

204名年龄≥50岁、种族多样的受试者,他们同意参与一项旨在改进预先指示所用表格的试验。

测量指标

达到完全理解所需的同意过程通过次数。使用成人功能性健康素养简表(分数范围为0至36)对英语和西班牙语读写能力进行评估。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为61岁,40%的人读写能力有限(成人功能性健康素养简表得分<23)。只有28%的受试者在首次通过时正确回答了所有理解问题。调整后,较低的读写能力(P = 0.04)和黑人身份(P = 0.03)与需要更多次通过同意过程相关。在双变量分析中,不以英语为主要语言与需要更多次通过同意过程相关(P<0.01),但在多变量分析中并非如此(P>0.05)。在第二次通过后,大多数受试者(80%)正确回答了所有问题。采用教到目标的策略,参与同意过程的98%的参与者实现了完全理解。

结论

较低的读写能力和少数族裔身份是理解同意信息的重要决定因素。使用修改后的同意过程,无论读写能力或语言障碍如何,几乎不需要额外的教育就能实现完全理解。

相似文献

1
Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):867-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00535.x.
2
3
Using principles of health literacy to enhance the informed consent process.
AORN J. 2008 Jul;88(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.03.001.
4
Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):31-46. doi: 10.1177/1556264616637483.
5
Satisfying the needs of Japanese cancer patients: a comparative study of detailed and standard informed consent documents.
Clin Trials. 2014 Feb;11(1):86-95. doi: 10.1177/1740774513515550. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Orthodontic informed consent considering information load and serial position effect.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Mar;147(3):363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.021.
8
Improved pregnant women's understanding of research information by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomised controlled study nested in neonatal research.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Sep;103(5):F403-F407. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312615. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Healthy Homes Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial of a place-based smoke-free home intervention in affordable housing.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 29;20(7):e0328786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328786. eCollection 2025.
5
Health Care Access and Use Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 May 2;6(5):e250820. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0820.
9
"Nobody Can Be Equipped for This": Advice From New Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1506-1516. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19405. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
10
Illicit Substance Use and Treatment Access Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.
JAMA. 2025 Apr 8;333(14):1222-1231. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.27922.

本文引用的文献

1
Tailored education may reduce health literacy disparities in asthma self-management.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Oct 15;172(8):980-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1291OC. Epub 2005 Aug 4.
2
Improving the readability and processability of a pediatric informed consent document: effects on parents' understanding.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Apr;159(4):347-52. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.4.347.
4
Health literacy among Spanish-speaking Latino parents with limited English proficiency.
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):56-9. doi: 10.1367/A04-093R.1.
5
Can we ensure that all research subjects give valid consent?
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 8;164(20):2201-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.20.2201.
8
African American patients' perspectives on medical decision making.
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 8;164(5):525-30. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.5.525.
9
Functional health literacy and the quality of physician-patient communication among diabetes patients.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Mar;52(3):315-23. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00107-1.
10
Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):907-15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验