Paustenbach Dennis, Galbraith David
ChemRisk Inc., San Francisco, California 94105, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Aug;114(8):1143-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8755.
Using modern analytical technology, it is now possible to measure almost any chemical present in our bodies. The future role of classical exposure assessment will perhaps be marginalized because biomonitoring programs can directly measure the concentration of chemicals that are present in biologic matrices. Although the concentration of chemicals in the environment will continue to be measured and related to exposure parameters, the prioritization of the national environmental agenda will be dictated by biomonitoring. Recent biomonitoring studies have examined the levels of >200 chemicals. Biomonitoring data, by themselves, are not informative in helping consumers understand their individual health risk. A major challenge facing those who conduct biomonitoring programs is how to best communicate the information to the public. In this article, we review benefits and challenges, along with select results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2005 National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. We recommend that these data be carefully interpreted, with the goal of establishing baseline exposure information, rather than creating surrogates for conclusions about human health risk.
利用现代分析技术,现在几乎可以测量我们体内存在的任何化学物质。由于生物监测项目能够直接测量生物基质中存在的化学物质的浓度,经典暴露评估未来的作用可能会被边缘化。尽管环境中化学物质的浓度仍将继续被测量并与暴露参数相关联,但国家环境议程的优先事项将由生物监测决定。最近的生物监测研究检测了200多种化学物质的含量。生物监测数据本身并不能有效地帮助消费者了解其个人健康风险。开展生物监测项目的人员面临的一个主要挑战是如何以最佳方式向公众传达这些信息。在本文中,我们回顾了益处与挑战,以及疾病控制与预防中心《2005年美国人群环境化学物暴露国家报告》的部分结果。我们建议应谨慎解读这些数据,目的是建立基线暴露信息,而不是为关于人类健康风险的结论创造替代指标。