Mayer Lawrence D, Harasym Troy O, Tardi Paul G, Harasym Natashia L, Shew Clifford R, Johnstone Sharon A, Ramsay Euan C, Bally Marcel B, Janoff Andrew S
Celator Pharmaceuticals Corp., 1779 West 75th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6P 6P2.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2006 Jul;5(7):1854-63. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0118.
Anticancer drug combinations can act synergistically or antagonistically against tumor cells in vitro depending on the ratios of the individual agents comprising the combination. The importance of drug ratios in vivo, however, has heretofore not been investigated, and combination chemotherapy treatment regimens continue to be developed based on the maximum tolerated dose of the individual agents. We systematically examined three different drug combinations representing a range of anticancer drug classes with distinct molecular mechanisms (irinotecan/floxuridine, cytarabine/daunorubicin, and cisplatin/daunorubicin) for drug ratio-dependent synergy. In each case, synergistic interactions were observed in vitro at certain drug/drug molar ratio ranges (1:1, 5:1, and 10:1, respectively), whereas other ratios were additive or antagonistic. We were able to maintain fixed drug ratios in plasma of mice for 24 hours after i.v. injection for all three combinations by controlling and overcoming the inherent dissimilar pharmacokinetics of individual drugs through encapsulation in liposomal carrier systems. The liposomes not only maintained drug ratios in the plasma after injection, but also delivered the formulated drug ratio directly to tumor tissue. In vivo maintenance of drug ratios shown to be synergistic in vitro provided increased efficacy in preclinical tumor models, whereas attenuated antitumor activity was observed when antagonistic drug ratios were maintained. Fixing synergistic drug ratios in pharmaceutical carriers provides an avenue by which anticancer drug combinations can be optimized prospectively for maximum therapeutic activity during preclinical development and differs from current practice in which dosing regimens are developed empirically in late-stage clinical trials based on tolerability.
抗癌药物组合在体外对肿瘤细胞的作用可能是协同的,也可能是拮抗的,这取决于组成组合的各个药物的比例。然而,药物比例在体内的重要性迄今尚未得到研究,联合化疗治疗方案仍在根据各个药物的最大耐受剂量来制定。我们系统地研究了三种不同的药物组合,它们代表了一系列具有不同分子机制的抗癌药物类别(伊立替康/氟尿苷、阿糖胞苷/柔红霉素和顺铂/柔红霉素),以确定药物比例依赖性协同作用。在每种情况下,在特定的药物/药物摩尔比范围内(分别为1:1、5:1和10:1)在体外观察到协同相互作用,而其他比例则是相加或拮抗的。通过将药物封装在脂质体载体系统中,控制并克服各个药物固有的不同药代动力学,我们能够在静脉注射后24小时内在小鼠血浆中维持所有三种组合的固定药物比例。脂质体不仅在注射后维持血浆中的药物比例,还将配制好的药物比例直接递送至肿瘤组织。在体内维持在体外显示为协同的药物比例,在临床前肿瘤模型中提高了疗效,而当维持拮抗药物比例时则观察到抗肿瘤活性减弱。在药物载体中固定协同药物比例提供了一条途径,通过该途径可以在临床前开发期间前瞻性地优化抗癌药物组合以获得最大治疗活性,这与目前的做法不同,目前的做法是在后期临床试验中根据耐受性凭经验制定给药方案。