Suppr超能文献

进化图片与欺诈指控:恩斯特·海克尔的胚胎学插图。

Pictures of evolution and charges of fraud: Ernst Haeckel's embryological illustrations.

作者信息

Hopwood Nick

机构信息

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Isis. 2006 Jun;97(2):260-301. doi: 10.1086/504734.

Abstract

Comparative illustrations of vertebrate embryos by the leading nineteenth-century Darwinist Ernst Haeckel have been both highly contested and canonical. Though the target of repeated fraud charges since 1868, the pictures were widely reproduced in textbooks through the twentieth century. Concentrating on their first ten years, this essay uses the accusations to shed light on the novelty of Haeckel's visual argumentation and to explore how images come to count as proper representations or illegitimate schematics as they cross between the esoteric and exoteric circles of science. It exploits previously unused manuscripts to reconstruct the drawing, printing, and publishing of the illustrations that attracted the first and most influential attack, compares these procedures to standard practice, and highlights their originality. It then explains why, though Haeckel was soon accused, controversy ignited only seven years later, after he aligned a disciplinary struggle over embryology with a major confrontation between liberal nationalism--and Catholicism--and why the contested pictures nevertheless survived.

摘要

19世纪主要的达尔文主义者恩斯特·海克尔绘制的脊椎动物胚胎对比插图,既备受争议,又堪称经典。自1868年以来,这些图片虽多次被指控造假,但在整个20世纪却被广泛转载于教科书中。本文聚焦于其最初十年,通过这些指控来揭示海克尔视觉论证的新颖之处,并探讨当图像在科学的深奥与通俗圈子之间传播时,是如何被视为恰当的表述或非法的示意图的。文章利用此前未被使用的手稿来重构那些引发首次也是最具影响力攻击的插图的绘制、印刷和出版过程,将这些过程与标准做法进行比较,并突出其原创性。接着文章解释了为何尽管海克尔很快就受到指控,但争议直到七年后才爆发,当时他将一场关于胚胎学的学科斗争与自由民族主义和天主教之间的一场重大对抗联系在一起,以及为何这些有争议的图片依然留存了下来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验