• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二维空间编码

Spatial coding in two dimensions.

作者信息

Rubichi Sandro, Vu Kim-Phuong L, Nicoletti Roberto, Proctor Robert W

机构信息

Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):201-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03193832.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193832
PMID:16892983
Abstract

There has been growing interest in exploring human performance for situations in which stimuli and/or responses vary along both horizontal and vertical dimensions. Earlier studies indicated that there is a prevalence of the horizontal dimension over the vertical dimension in the spatial codes that are used for response selection. We review evidence about spatial coding for 2-D stimulus-response sets and accounts that have been proposed for explaining how it takes place. Particular attention is devoted to the relative salience account, which provides the most comprehensive explanation of 2-D spatial coding. We also evaluate the influence of speed of spatial code formation, number of reference frames, and learning on subjects' performance in 2-D tasks.

摘要

对于刺激和/或反应在水平和垂直维度上都有所变化的情况,人们对探索人类表现的兴趣与日俱增。早期研究表明,在用于反应选择的空间编码中,水平维度比垂直维度更为普遍。我们回顾了关于二维刺激-反应集空间编码的证据,以及为解释其发生方式而提出的各种理论。我们特别关注相对显著性理论,它对二维空间编码提供了最全面的解释。我们还评估了空间编码形成速度、参考框架数量和学习对受试者在二维任务中表现的影响。

相似文献

1
Spatial coding in two dimensions.二维空间编码
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):201-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03193832.
2
The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions.二维刺激-反应相容性中的患病率效应是维度相对显著性的函数。
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):815-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03194748.
3
Right-left prevalence effect with horizontal and vertical effectors.
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Feb;66(2):255-63. doi: 10.3758/bf03194877.
4
Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility.二维空间兼容性中左右和上下患病率的决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Aug;27(4):813-28.
5
Effects of precuing horizontal and vertical dimensions on right-left prevalence.预提示水平和垂直维度对左右偏向的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):949-58. doi: 10.3758/bf03193440.
6
Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):571-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0899-z.
7
Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.简短不兼容练习对西蒙效应的影响:沿垂直维度以及跨垂直与水平维度的迁移
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Nov;233(11):3313-21. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4399-1. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
8
No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes.
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jan;58(1):102-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03205480.
9
No overall right-left prevalence for horizontal and vertical Simon effects.水平和垂直西蒙效应不存在整体的左右偏向性。
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):929-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03193544.
10
Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses.垂直与水平空间兼容性:双手反应中的左右优势
Psychol Res. 2000;64(1):25-40. doi: 10.1007/s004260000035.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dynamic Interplay of Affective, Cognitive and Contextual Resources on Children's Creative Potential: The Modulatory Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence.情感、认知和情境资源对儿童创造潜力的动态相互作用:特质情商的调节作用。
J Intell. 2023 Jan 4;11(1):11. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11010011.
2
What Simon "knows" about cultural differences: The influence of cultural orientation and traffic directionality on spatial compatibility effects.西蒙“知道”的文化差异:文化取向和交通方向性对空间兼容性影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Apr;51(3):526-542. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01360-9. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Wearing the face mask affects our social attention over space.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.无关位置信息对表现的影响:西蒙和空间斯特鲁普效应综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959.
2
Processing locational and orientational information.处理位置和方向信息。
Mem Cognit. 1977 Sep;5(5):602-12. doi: 10.3758/BF03197406.
3
Effects of precuing horizontal and vertical dimensions on right-left prevalence.预提示水平和垂直维度对左右偏向的影响。
佩戴口罩会影响我们在空间上的社交注意力。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:923558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923558. eCollection 2022.
4
Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.透过猫眼看世界:使用非人类化身体验自发采择视角过程的证据
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01082-5. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
Assessing the impact of previous experience on lie effects through a transfer paradigm.通过转移范式评估先前经验对谎言效应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 26;11(1):8961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88387-1.
6
Response Priming with Horizontally and Vertically Moving Primes: A Comparison of German, Malaysian, and Japanese Subjects.使用水平和垂直移动启动刺激的反应启动:德国、马来西亚和日本受试者的比较。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020 Apr 26;16(2):131-149. doi: 10.5709/acp-0291-y. eCollection 2020.
7
FEF Excitability in Attentional Bias: A TMS-EEG Study.注意力偏差中的用力呼气流量(FEF)兴奋性:一项经颅磁刺激-脑电图(TMS-EEG)研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jan 11;12:333. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00333. eCollection 2018.
8
Sharing Different Reference Frames: How Stimulus Setup and Task Setup Shape Egocentric and Allocentric Simon Effects.共享不同的参考框架:刺激设置和任务设置如何塑造自我中心和异我中心西蒙效应。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;9:2063. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02063. eCollection 2018.
9
The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.多模态停止信号西蒙效应:表明在停止信号西蒙范式中刺激特征的相关性对事件表征和任务表现的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 25;9:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02011. eCollection 2018.
10
What spatial coordinate defines color-space synesthesia?什么空间坐标定义了颜色空间联觉?
Brain Cogn. 2016 Jun;105:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):949-58. doi: 10.3758/bf03193440.
4
No overall right-left prevalence for horizontal and vertical Simon effects.水平和垂直西蒙效应不存在整体的左右偏向性。
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):929-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03193544.
5
Task rule-congruency and Simon-like effects in switching between spatial tasks.空间任务切换中的任务规则一致性和类西蒙效应。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Aug;58(6):1023-41. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000421.
6
Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes.具有与任务无关的空间编码的左右流行率。
Psychol Res. 2005 Jan;69(3):167-78. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0168-z. Epub 2004 Feb 4.
7
Right-left prevalence effect with horizontal and vertical effectors.
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Feb;66(2):255-63. doi: 10.3758/bf03194877.
8
A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.西蒙效应的反应辨别解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Apr;30(2):365-77. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.365.
9
Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?西蒙效应是否存在左右优势?
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Nov;65(8):1318-29. doi: 10.3758/bf03194855.
10
S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.S-R兼容性:刺激与反应编码的空间特征。
J Exp Psychol. 1953 Sep;46(3):199-210. doi: 10.1037/h0062827.