Garofalo Gioacchino, Gawryszewski Luiz L, Riggio Lucia
Department of Medicine & Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01082-5. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
In many daily face-to-face interactions, people are able to take the perspective of others, for example, coding right and left based on point-of-view of others. In the present study, we investigated whether observers are able to take the perspective of a non-human figure such as a cat, observing the same effects obtained with human or robot avatars. In both experiments, we used a centrally presented stimulus (i.e. a cat), with its tail lateralized to the left or to the right. Participants had to respond to the side of the tail with a lateralized keypress. In Experiment 1 (spatial perspective taking task), participants were required to explicitly adopt the cat's perspective to respond, whereas in Experiment 2 (SR compatibility task), this was not explicitly required. In both experiments, faster RTs are obtained when the cat is presented back, with a greater difference between front and back views when the tail is on the right; furthermore, there is no temporal modulation of the back-front effect. These common results between the two experiments are interpreted on the basis of the spatial perspective taking processes, elicited voluntarily (Experiment 1) or spontaneously (Experiment 2).
在许多日常面对面互动中,人们能够采取他人的视角,例如,根据他人的视角来区分左右。在本研究中,我们调查了观察者是否能够采取非人类角色(如猫)的视角,观察与人类或机器人化身相同的效果。在两个实验中,我们都使用了中央呈现的刺激物(即一只猫),其尾巴偏向左侧或右侧。参与者必须通过向一侧按键来对尾巴的方向做出反应。在实验1(空间视角采择任务)中,要求参与者明确采取猫的视角来做出反应,而在实验2(刺激-反应兼容性任务)中,则没有明确要求这一点。在两个实验中,当猫背向呈现时,反应时更快,当尾巴在右侧时,前后视图之间的差异更大;此外,前后效应没有时间调制。基于空间视角采择过程,对两个实验的这些共同结果进行了解释,该过程在实验1中是自愿引发的,在实验2中是自发引发的。