Schomerus Georg, Borsche Julia, Matschinger Herbert, Angermeyer Matthias C
Department of Psychiatry, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Aug;194(8):622-4. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000231428.98039.6c.
Research on public knowledge about schizophrenia has so far examined various closed questions eliciting recognition-based knowledge rather than unprompted knowledge. We aim to explore the unprompted popular knowledge regarding causes and treatment of schizophrenia. In a representative survey conducted in Germany in 2001 (N = 5025), two open questions asked respondents to name possible causes and treatment options for schizophrenia. Answers were noted down verbatim and later grouped into categories. Psychosocial and biological causal explanations were equally predominant. Respondents recommended drug treatment more frequently than psychosocial measures like psychotherapy, and they mentioned a doctor's visit or a hospital stay most frequently as the adequate treatment setting. About 45% of respondents knew nothing about possible causes or treatments of schizophrenia. Hence, whereas those confidently naming causes or treatment options for schizophrenia favored professional medical treatment more than previously found, overall knowledge about schizophrenia has thus far been overestimated.
迄今为止,关于公众对精神分裂症的了解的研究考察了各种封闭式问题,这些问题引出的是基于认知的知识,而非自发产生的知识。我们旨在探究关于精神分裂症病因和治疗的自发产生的大众知识。在2001年于德国进行的一项代表性调查(N = 5025)中,两个开放式问题要求受访者说出精神分裂症可能的病因和治疗选择。答案被逐字记录下来,随后进行分类。心理社会和生物学方面的因果解释同样占主导地位。受访者推荐药物治疗的频率高于心理治疗等心理社会措施,并且他们最常提到看医生或住院作为合适的治疗方式。约45%的受访者对精神分裂症可能的病因或治疗方法一无所知。因此,虽然那些自信地说出精神分裂症病因或治疗选择的人比之前发现的更倾向于专业医学治疗,但迄今为止,关于精神分裂症的总体知识一直被高估。