Knight Andrew T, Driver Amanda, Cowling Richard M, Maze Kristal, Desmet Philip G, Lombard Amanda T, Rouget Mathieu, Botha Mark A, Boshoff Andre F, Castley J Guy, Goodman Peter S, Mackinnon Kathy, Pierce Shirley M, Sims-Castley Rebecca, Stewart Warrick I, von Hase Amrei
Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 77000, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa.
Conserv Biol. 2006 Jun;20(3):739-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00452.x.
Systematic conservation assessment and conservation planning are two distinct fields of conservation science often confused as one and the same. Systematic conservation assessment is the technical, often computer-based, identification of priority areas for conservation. Conservation planning is composed of a systematic conservation assessment coupled with processes for development of an implementation strategy and stakeholder collaboration. The peer-reviewed conservation biology literature abounds with studies analyzing the performance of assessments (e.g., area-selection techniques). This information alone, however can never deliver effective conservation action; it informs conservation planning. Examples of how to translate systematic assessment outputs into knowledge and then use them for "doing" conservation are rare. South Africa has received generous international and domestic funding for regional conservation planning since the mid-1990s. We reviewed eight South African conservation planning processes and identified key ingredients of best practice for undertaking systematic conservation assessments in a way that facilitates implementing conservation action. These key ingredients include the design of conservation planning processes, skills for conservation assessment teams, collaboration with stakeholders, and interpretation and mainstreaming of products (e.g., maps) for stakeholders. Social learning institutions are critical to the successful operationalization of assessments within broader conservation planning processes and should include not only conservation planners but also diverse interest groups, including rural landowners, politicians, and government employees.
系统保护评估和保护规划是保护科学中两个截然不同的领域,常被混为一谈。系统保护评估是一种技术性的、通常基于计算机的确定保护优先区域的方法。保护规划则由系统保护评估以及制定实施战略和利益相关者协作的流程组成。经过同行评审的保护生物学文献中有大量分析评估绩效(如区域选择技术)的研究。然而,仅凭这些信息永远无法带来有效的保护行动;它为保护规划提供信息。关于如何将系统评估结果转化为知识并将其用于“开展”保护工作的例子很少。自20世纪90年代中期以来,南非获得了大量国际和国内资金用于区域保护规划。我们审查了八个南非保护规划流程,并确定了以促进实施保护行动的方式进行系统保护评估的最佳实践关键要素。这些关键要素包括保护规划流程的设计、保护评估团队的技能、与利益相关者的协作以及为利益相关者对产品(如地图)的解读和主流化。社会学习机构对于在更广泛的保护规划流程中成功实施评估至关重要,不仅应包括保护规划者,还应包括各种利益集团,包括农村土地所有者、政治家和政府雇员。