Suppr超能文献

这是“我的”病人吗?建立和验证将患者与初级保健提供者相匹配的预测模型。

Is this "my" patient? Development and validation of a predictive model to link patients to primary care providers.

作者信息

Atlas Steven J, Chang Yuchiao, Lasko Thomas A, Chueh Henry C, Grant Richard W, Barry Michael J

机构信息

General Medicine Division, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):973-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00509.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the quality of care provided by individual primary care physicians (PCPs) may be limited by failing to know which patients the PCP feels personally responsible for.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model for linking patients to specific PCPs.

DESIGN

Retrospective convenience sample.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen PCPs from 10 practice sites within an academic adult primary care network.

MEASUREMENTS

Each PCP reviewed the records for all outpatients seen over the preceding 3 years (16,435 patients reviewed) and designated each patient as "My Patient" or "Not My Patient." Using this reference standard, we developed an algorithm with logistic regression modeling to predict "My Patient" using development and validation subsets drawn from the same patient set. Quality of care was then assessed by "My Patient" or "Not My Patient" designation by analyzing cancer screening test rates.

RESULTS

Overall, PCPs designated 11,226 patients (68.3%, range per provider 15% to 93%) to be "My Patient." The model accurately categorized patients in development and validation subsets (combined sensitivity 80.4%, specificity 93.7%, and positive predictive value 96.5%). To achieve positive predictive values of > 90% for individual PCPs, the model excluded 19.6% of PCP "My Patients" (range 5.5% to 75.3%). Cancer screening rates were higher among model-predicted "My Patients."

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-third of patients seen were considered "Not My Patient" by the PCP, although this proportion varied widely. We developed and validated a simple model to link specific patients and PCPs. Such efforts may help effectively target interventions to improve primary care quality.

摘要

背景

评估个体初级保健医生(PCP)提供的医疗服务质量可能会受到限制,因为不知道PCP认为自己对哪些患者负有个人责任。

目的

开发并验证一种将患者与特定PCP联系起来的模型。

设计

回顾性便利样本。

参与者

来自学术性成人初级保健网络中10个执业地点的18名PCP。

测量

每位PCP回顾了前3年所有门诊患者的记录(共回顾了16435名患者),并将每位患者指定为“我的患者”或“非我的患者”。使用这个参考标准,我们通过逻辑回归建模开发了一种算法,使用从同一患者集中抽取的开发子集和验证子集来预测“我的患者”。然后通过分析癌症筛查测试率,根据“我的患者”或“非我的患者”的指定来评估医疗服务质量。

结果

总体而言,PCP将11226名患者(68.3%,每位提供者的范围为15%至93%)指定为“我的患者”。该模型在开发子集和验证子集中对患者进行了准确分类(综合灵敏度为80.4%,特异性为93.7%,阳性预测值为96.5%)。为了使个体PCP的阳性预测值>90%,该模型排除了19.6%的PCP“我的患者”(范围为5.5%至75.3%)。模型预测的“我的患者”中的癌症筛查率更高。

结论

尽管这一比例差异很大,但近三分之一的就诊患者被PCP认为是“非我的患者”。我们开发并验证了一个简单的模型来将特定患者与PCP联系起来。此类努力可能有助于有效地针对性干预以提高初级保健质量。

相似文献

1
Is this "my" patient? Development and validation of a predictive model to link patients to primary care providers.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):973-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00509.x.
2
Productivity, quality, and patient satisfaction: comparison of part-time and full-time primary care physicians.
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Oct;16(10):663-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.01111.x.
4
When do older patients change primary care physicians?
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Nov-Dec;17(6):453-60. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.17.6.453.
5
Primary care provider attitudes are associated with smoking cessation counseling and referral.
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):929-34. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173566.01877.ac.
6
Managed care, primary care, and the patient-practitioner relationship.
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr;17(4):270-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10309.x.
8
Attitudes and current practice of primary care physicians in acute stroke management.
Stroke. 2007 Apr;38(4):1298-303. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000259889.72520.07. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
10
Patients who feel judged about their weight have lower trust in their primary care providers.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Oct;97(1):128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting a regular medical doctor index: A new measure of patient-physician affiliation for health administrative data.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0314381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314381. eCollection 2024.
3
Predicting post-stroke cognitive impairment using electronic health record data.
Int J Stroke. 2024 Oct;19(8):898-906. doi: 10.1177/17474930241246156. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Gestational Glucose Intolerance and Risk of Future Diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(1):83-91. doi: 10.2337/dc22-1390.
5
Natural Language Processing to Improve Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation Using Electronic Health Records.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e026014. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026014. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
Analysis of Variation in Organizational Definitions of Primary Care Panels: A Systematic Review.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227497. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7497.
7
Re-CHARGE-AF: Recalibration of the CHARGE-AF Model for Atrial Fibrillation Risk Prediction in Patients With Acute Stroke.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 2;10(21):e022363. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022363. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Application of 2021 American Diabetes Association Glycemic Treatment Clinical Practice Recommendations in Primary Care.
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jun;44(6):1443-1446. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0013. Epub 2021 May 20.
9
Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jul 14;4(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00225-6.
10
Attributing Patients to Pediatric Residents Using Electronic Health Record Features Augmented with Audit Logs.
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 May;11(3):442-451. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713133. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated identification of a physician's primary patients.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):74-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1876. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
2
Health care in America--still too separate, not yet equal.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 5;351(6):603-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048181.
6
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.
7
Towards a theory of continuity of care.
J R Soc Med. 2003 Apr;96(4):160-6. doi: 10.1177/014107680309600402.
8
Loyalty to the regular care provider: patients' and physicians' views.
Fam Pract. 2001 Feb;18(1):53-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.1.53.
10
How good is the quality of health care in the United States?
Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):517-63, 509. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00105.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验