Cutright Phillips, Stack Steven, Fernquist Robert M
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Arch Suicide Res. 2006;10(4):365-82. doi: 10.1080/13811110600791205.
Male suicide rates, circa 1960, specific to age and marital status for 12 developed countries show married men with lower suicide rates than not married men. This results in differences in the age structures of married and not married suicide rates. We test three explanations of lower married than not married suicide rates: 1) Gibbs and Martin's (1964) marital status integration hypothesis; 2) marital status differences in norms regarding the acceptability of suicide; and 3) Durkheim's societal integration theory. All three explanations are supported by multivariate regressions. The strongest support is for societal integration. The models explain over 80% of the variance in both married and not married male age-specific suicide rates. These regression equations generate predicted suicide rates and these predicted rates are then used to see if they account for the observed age structures of married and not married men. They do in 19 of 24 tests.
约1960年时,针对12个发达国家按年龄和婚姻状况划分的男性自杀率显示,已婚男性的自杀率低于未婚男性。这导致已婚和未婚自杀率的年龄结构存在差异。我们检验了三种关于已婚自杀率低于未婚自杀率的解释:1)吉布斯和马丁(1964年)的婚姻状况整合假说;2)关于自杀可接受性规范方面的婚姻状况差异;3)涂尔干的社会整合理论。所有这三种解释都得到了多元回归的支持。最强有力的支持是针对社会整合的。这些模型解释了已婚和未婚男性特定年龄自杀率中超过80%的方差。这些回归方程生成了预测自杀率,然后使用这些预测率来查看它们是否能解释观察到的已婚和未婚男性的年龄结构。在24次测试中有19次能够解释。