Suppr超能文献

针对老年人的预防性初级保健外展干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of preventive primary care outreach interventions aimed at older people: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Ploeg Jenny, Feightner John, Hutchison Brian, Patterson Christopher, Sigouin Christopher, Gauld Mary

机构信息

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2005 Sep;51(9):1244-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of preventive primary care outreach interventions aimed at older people. Knowing whether such interventions are effective could help busy family physicians make choices about which preventive care services to provide.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, AgeLine, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and EMBASE databases and reviewed the reference lists of retrieved articles.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies of preventive primary care interventions aimed at patients 65 years and older if the studies were randomized controlled trials and if any of the following outcomes was reported: mortality, living in the community, admission to acute care hospitals, and admission to long-term care. We defined preventive primary care outreach as proactive, provider-initiated care, which can be provided by nurses, physicians, other professionals, or volunteers, that is in addition to usual care and is provided in primary care settings. Such care can be provided through home visits, office visits, telephone contacts, or a combination of these methods.

SYNTHESIS

We assessed the quality of studies and extracted descriptive information on study populations, interventions, and outcomes for 19 trials involving 14,911 patients. Summary odds ratios were estimated for each outcome using a random effects model.

CONCLUSION

This review showed that studies of preventive primary care outreach interventions aimed at older people were associated with a 17% reduction of mortality and a 23% increased likelihood of continuing to live in the community.

摘要

目的

确定针对老年人的预防性初级保健外展干预措施的有效性。了解此类干预措施是否有效有助于忙碌的家庭医生选择提供哪些预防性保健服务。

数据来源

我们检索了MEDLINE、CINAHL、AgeLine、Cochrane对照试验注册库和EMBASE数据库,并查阅了检索文章的参考文献列表。

研究选择

如果研究为随机对照试验,且报告了以下任何一项结果:死亡率、社区生活情况、入住急症医院情况和入住长期护理机构情况,我们纳入针对65岁及以上患者的预防性初级保健干预研究。我们将预防性初级保健外展定义为主动的、由提供者发起的护理,可由护士、医生、其他专业人员或志愿者提供,是常规护理之外且在初级保健机构提供的护理。此类护理可通过家访、门诊、电话联系或这些方法的组合来提供。

综合分析

我们评估了研究质量,并提取了19项涉及14911名患者的试验的研究人群、干预措施和结果的描述性信息。使用随机效应模型估计每个结果的汇总比值比。

结论

本综述表明,针对老年人的预防性初级保健外展干预研究与死亡率降低17%以及继续在社区生活的可能性增加23%相关。

相似文献

4
A systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based mental health outreach services for older adults.
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Nov;55(11):1237-49. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.11.1237.
6
Inreach and outreach interventions to improve mammography use.
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2001 Fall;56(4):166-73, 188.
7
Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people living in the community: systematic review.
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):754-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.754.
8
Preventive medicine in primary care. Moving from theory to practice.
Postgrad Med. 1991 Sep 1;90(3):125-8. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1991.11701038.
9
Reflections on wisdom and self.
Aust Fam Physician. 2012 Dec;41(12):917.
10
Preventive Medicine Through Community Outreach: An Interview with Frederick L. Altice, MD.
Yale J Biol Med. 2021 Mar 31;94(1):175-181. eCollection 2021 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Solid reasons to equitably screen.
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 May 1;35(3):518-521. eCollection 2025.
2
3
[Not Available].
CMAJ. 2023 Dec 10;195(48):E1674-E1701. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230237-f.
4
Effectiveness of a home health monitoring and education program for complex chronic patients, led by primary care nurses.
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;11:1281980. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281980. eCollection 2023.
5
Preventive care recommendations to promote health equity.
CMAJ. 2023 Sep 25;195(37):E1250-E1273. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230237.
10
Physician home visits in Ontario: a cross-sectional analysis of patient characteristics and postvisit use of health care services.
CMAJ Open. 2022 Aug 9;10(3):E732-E745. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210307. Print 2022 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
The global challenge of understanding and meeting the needs of the frail older population.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2002 Aug;14(4):223-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03324442.
3
Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ. 2001 Sep 29;323(7315):719-25. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7315.719.
4
A randomised controlled trial of the outcome of health assessment of people aged 75 years and over.
Med J Aust. 2001 Jul 16;175(2):104-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143541.x.
6
The effects of a collaborative model of primary care on the mortality and hospital use of community-dwelling older adults.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Feb;56(2):M106-12. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.2.m106.
8
What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Sep;53(9):964-72. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00188-8.
9
Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000028. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000028.
10
A thorough going over: evidence for health assessments for older persons.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Apr;24(2):117-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00131.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验