Suppr超能文献

进行公平筛查的充分理由。

Solid reasons to equitably screen.

作者信息

Persaud Nav, Lofters Aisha

机构信息

Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Women's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 May 1;35(3):518-521. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Preventive care can address inequities, or avoidable disparities in health outcomes. Preventive care, including screening for cardiovascular disease and cancer, and health promotion including offering counselling and preventive treatments, remains a routine part of primary care for good reasons. Here, we provide a fresh perspective on preventive care that focuses on health equity and we explain how centering on health equity can bring into focus the demonstrated benefits of screening in the context of other primary care interventions, the importance of patient preferences, and the relative magnitude of screening harms. Informed patients often prefer screening, and this should be offered where reasonable and the potential implications of negative screening recommendations for health equity should be carefully considered. The evidence for screening is better than the evidence of many other routine and uncontroversial aspects of care and the downsides of screening are sometimes overstated.

摘要

预防性保健可以解决健康结果方面的不公平现象,或可避免的差异。出于合理原因,预防性保健,包括心血管疾病和癌症筛查,以及包括提供咨询和预防性治疗在内的健康促进,仍然是初级保健的常规组成部分。在此,我们提供了一个关于预防性保健的全新视角,该视角侧重于健康公平,并且我们解释了以健康公平为中心如何能够凸显筛查在其他初级保健干预措施背景下已证实的益处、患者偏好的重要性以及筛查危害的相对程度。明智的患者通常更倾向于筛查,在合理的情况下应提供筛查,并且应仔细考虑阴性筛查建议对健康公平的潜在影响。筛查的证据比许多其他常规且无争议的医疗方面的证据更好,而且筛查的弊端有时被夸大了。

相似文献

1
Solid reasons to equitably screen.进行公平筛查的充分理由。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 May 1;35(3):518-521. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Another piece in the overdiagnosis jigsaw puzzle.过度诊断拼图中的另一块。
BMJ Oncol. 2023 Dec 21;2(1):e000225. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000225. eCollection 2023.
7
Racialised people in clinical guideline panels.临床指南小组中的受种族化影响人群。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 8;399(10320):139-140. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02759-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验