Motl Susannah, Zhuang Yanli, Waters Christopher M, Stewart Clinton F
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(9):871-903. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645090-00002.
Despite aggressive therapy, the majority of primary and metastatic brain tumour patients have a poor prognosis with brief survival periods. This is because of the different pharmacokinetic parameters of systemically administered chemotherapeutic agents between the brain and the rest of the body. Specifically, before systemically administered drugs can distribute into the CNS, they must cross two membrane barriers, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier (BCB). To some extent, these structures function to exclude xenobiotics, such as anticancer drugs, from the brain. An understanding of these unique barriers is essential to predict when and how systemically administered drugs will be transported to the brain. Specifically, factors such as physiological variables (e.g. blood flow), physicochemical properties of the drug (e.g. molecular weight), as well as influx and efflux transporter expression at the BBB and BCB (e.g. adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporters) determine what compounds reach the CNS. A large body of preclinical and clinical research exists regarding brain penetration of anticancer agents. In most cases, a surrogate endpoint (i.e. CSF to plasma area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] ratio) is used to describe how effectively agents can be transported into the CNS. Some agents, such as the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, have high CSF to plasma AUC ratios, making them valid therapeutic options for primary and metastatic brain tumours. In contrast, other agents like the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, have a low CSF to plasma AUC ratio. Knowledge of these data can have important clinical implications. For example, it is now known that chronic myelogenous leukaemia patients treated with imatinib might need additional CNS prophylaxis. Since most anticancer agents have limited brain penetration, new pharmacological approaches are needed to enhance delivery into the brain. BBB disruption, regional administration of chemotherapy and transporter modulation are all currently being evaluated in an effort to improve therapeutic outcomes. Additionally, since many chemotherapeutic agents are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 3A enzyme system, minimising drug interactions by avoiding concomitant drug therapies that are also metabolised through this system may potentially enhance outcomes. Specifically, the use of non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs and curtailing nonessential corticosteroid use may have an impact.
尽管进行了积极治疗,但大多数原发性和转移性脑肿瘤患者的预后仍然很差,生存期较短。这是因为全身给药的化疗药物在脑和身体其他部位之间具有不同的药代动力学参数。具体而言,在全身给药的药物能够分布到中枢神经系统之前,它们必须穿过两个膜屏障,即血脑屏障(BBB)和血脑脊液屏障(BCB)。在某种程度上,这些结构起到将诸如抗癌药物等外源性物质排除在脑外的作用。了解这些独特的屏障对于预测全身给药的药物何时以及如何转运至脑至关重要。具体来说,诸如生理变量(如血流量)、药物的物理化学性质(如分子量)以及血脑屏障和血脑脊液屏障处的流入和流出转运体表达(如三磷酸腺苷结合盒转运体)等因素决定了哪些化合物能够到达中枢神经系统。关于抗癌药物的脑渗透已有大量的临床前和临床研究。在大多数情况下,一个替代终点(即脑脊液与血浆浓度 - 时间曲线下面积[AUC]比值)被用于描述药物能够有效转运至中枢神经系统的程度。一些药物,如拓扑异构酶I抑制剂拓扑替康,具有较高的脑脊液与血浆AUC比值,使其成为原发性和转移性脑肿瘤的有效治疗选择。相比之下,其他药物如口服酪氨酸激酶抑制剂伊马替尼,其脑脊液与血浆AUC比值较低。了解这些数据可能具有重要的临床意义。例如,现在已知接受伊马替尼治疗的慢性粒细胞白血病患者可能需要额外的中枢神经系统预防措施。由于大多数抗癌药物的脑渗透有限,需要新的药理学方法来增强药物向脑内的递送。血脑屏障破坏、化疗的区域给药以及转运体调节目前都在进行评估,以努力改善治疗效果。此外,由于许多化疗药物由细胞色素P450 3A酶系统代谢,通过避免同时使用也经该系统代谢的药物疗法来最小化药物相互作用可能会潜在地改善治疗结果。具体而言,使用非酶诱导性抗癫痫药物以及减少不必要的皮质类固醇使用可能会产生影响。