• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读障碍儿童和发育正常儿童在拼写中对词法的运用。

Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children.

作者信息

Bourassa Derrick C, Treiman Rebecca, Kessler Brett

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, Canada.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):703-14. doi: 10.3758/bf03193589.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193589
PMID:16933775
Abstract

In English and some other languages, spelling problems that arise at a phonological level can sometimes be solved through consideration of morphology. For example, children could infer that tuned should contain an n and that fighting should contain a t because their stems include these letters. Children could thus avoid misspellings that might otherwise occur, such as "tud" and "fiding." We used a spelling-level match design to examine the extent to which children with dyslexia and younger typical children use morphology in this way. Both groups of children benefited from morphology to some extent, but not as much as they could have given their knowledge of the stems. Our results suggest that the spellings produced by older children with dyslexia are similar to those of younger normal children in their morphological characteristics, as well as in other ways.

摘要

在英语和其他一些语言中,有时可以通过考虑词形变化来解决语音层面出现的拼写问题。例如,孩子们可以推断出“tuned”应该包含一个“n”,“fighting”应该包含一个“t”,因为它们的词干包含这些字母。这样孩子们就可以避免可能出现的拼写错误,比如“tud”和“fiding”。我们采用了一种拼写水平匹配设计,以研究患有诵读困难症的儿童和年幼的正常儿童在多大程度上以这种方式运用词形变化。两组儿童在一定程度上都从词形变化中受益,但受益程度不如他们凭借对词干的了解本应达到的程度。我们的研究结果表明,患有诵读困难症的大龄儿童所产生的拼写在词形特征以及其他方面与年幼正常儿童的拼写相似。

相似文献

1
Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children.阅读障碍儿童和发育正常儿童在拼写中对词法的运用。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):703-14. doi: 10.3758/bf03193589.
2
Morphological constancy in spelling: a comparison of children with dyslexia and typically developing children.拼写中的形态恒常性:诵读困难儿童与正常发育儿童的比较
Dyslexia. 2008 Aug;14(3):155-69. doi: 10.1002/dys.368.
3
Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic-dysgraphic and normal children.阅读和拼写的单一或双重正字法表示?对意大利阅读障碍和正常儿童的研究。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010;27(4):305-33. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.543539. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
4
Precursors and consequences of phonemic length discrimination ability problems in children with reading disabilities and familial risk for dyslexia.阅读障碍症儿童及其家族阅读障碍症高危儿童的音素长度辨别能力问题的前兆和后果。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Oct;56(5):1462-75. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0072). Epub 2013 Jun 19.
5
Spelling and Morphology in Dyslexia: A Developmental Study Across the School Years.阅读障碍中的拼写与形态学:一项贯穿学年的发展性研究。
Dyslexia. 2017 Nov;23(4):324-344. doi: 10.1002/dys.1549. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
L2 Spelling Errors in Italian Children with Dyslexia.意大利诵读困难儿童的L2拼写错误。
Dyslexia. 2016 May;22(2):158-72. doi: 10.1002/dys.1522. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
7
Morphology and spelling in French students with dyslexia: the case of silent final letters.患有阅读障碍的法国学生的形态学与拼写:以词尾不发音字母为例
Ann Dyslexia. 2017 Apr;67(1):85-98. doi: 10.1007/s11881-016-0133-3. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
8
A pictographic method for teaching spelling to Greek dyslexic children.
Dyslexia. 2002 Apr-Jun;8(2):86-101. doi: 10.1002/dys.216.
9
Morphology and Spelling in French: A Comparison of At-Risk Readers and Typically Developing Children.法语中的形态学与拼写:风险阅读者与正常发育儿童的比较
Dyslexia. 2017 Nov;23(4):406-427. doi: 10.1002/dys.1565. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Comparing phonological skills and spelling abilities in children with reading and language impairments.比较有阅读和语言障碍儿童的语音技能与拼写能力。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb;43(1):111-24. doi: 10.1080/13682820601178584.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphological Complexity in Arabic Spelling and Its Implication for Cognitive Processing.阿拉伯语拼写中的形态复杂性及其对认知加工的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Feb;52(1):331-357. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09896-2. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
2
Semantics impacts response to phonics through spelling intervention in children with dyslexia.语义通过拼写干预影响诵读困难儿童对自然拼读的反应。
Ann Dyslexia. 2021 Oct;71(3):527-546. doi: 10.1007/s11881-021-00233-1. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Why Children With Dyslexia Struggle With Writing and How to Help Them.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students.学习障碍学生和正常学生在拼写派生形式时使用形态学知识的情况。
Ann Dyslexia. 1987 Jan;37(1):90-108. doi: 10.1007/BF02648061.
2
The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia.语素识别和形态意识在阅读障碍中的作用。
Ann Dyslexia. 1996 Jan;46(1):209-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02648177.
3
Morphological effects in children's spelling of French words.儿童法语单词拼写中的形态学影响。
阅读障碍儿童在写作方面遇到困难的原因及如何帮助他们。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Oct 24;49(4):843-863. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0024.
4
Relations between Reading and Writing: A Longitudinal Examination from Grades 3 to 6.阅读与写作之间的关系:三至六年级的纵向研究
Read Writ. 2018 Sep;31(7):1591-1618. doi: 10.1007/s11145-018-9855-4. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
Morpheme-Based Reading and Writing in Spanish Children with Dyslexia.基于词素的阅读与写作:针对患有阅读障碍的西班牙儿童
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 7;8:1952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01952. eCollection 2017.
6
The Impact of Transcription Writing Interventions for First-Grade Students.针对一年级学生的抄写书写干预措施的影响
Read Writ Q. 2017;33(5):484-499. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2016.1250142. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
7
Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW).拓展写作发展模式:发展性写作直接与间接效应模型(DIEW)
J Educ Psychol. 2017;109(1):35-50. doi: 10.1037/edu0000129.
8
The Role of Phonological versus Morphological Skills in the Development of Arabic Spelling: An Intervention Study.语音技能与形态技能在阿拉伯语拼写发展中的作用:一项干预研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Jun;45(3):507-35. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9362-6.
9
Kindergarten Predictors of Third Grade Writing.幼儿园阶段对三年级写作能力的预测因素。
Learn Individ Differ. 2015 Jan 1;37:27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.009.
10
The contributions of vocabulary and letter writing automaticity to word reading and spelling for kindergartners.幼儿园儿童的词汇量和字母书写自动化对单词阅读和拼写的影响。
Read Writ. 2014 Feb 1;27(2):237-253. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9440-9.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Jun;54(2):76-86. doi: 10.1037/h0087331.
4
Effects of Morphology on Children's Spelling of Final Consonant Clusters.词形对儿童词尾辅音连缀拼写的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Oct;63(1):141-70. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0045.
5
What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps.儿童在拼写时会使用哪些类型的语言信息?闪音的情况。
Child Dev. 1994 Oct;65(5):1318-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00819.x.
6
What happened to the "n" of sink? Children's spellings of final consonant clusters.
Cognition. 1995 Apr;55(1):1-38. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00638-2.
7
Spelling errors in context.语境中的拼写错误。
Br J Psychol. 1983 Aug;74 (Pt 3):353-64. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01867.x.
8
Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia.患有某种家族性阅读障碍的成年人的拼写错误。
Child Dev. 1986 Aug;57(4):1001-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00261.x.
9
Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: the case of initial consonant clusters.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1990 Aug;50(1):156-78. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90037-9.