Serra Matt, Oswald Karl M
Duke University, USA.
J Gen Psychol. 2006 Jul;133(3):301-17. doi: 10.3200/GENP.133.3.301-317.
Three experiments assess the veracity of the strategy disruption explanation of part-list cuing impairment. Experiment 1 demonstrated no mnemonic detriment in recall as a result of significant disruption of the participants' self-selected forward associative seriation retrieval strategy. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 while reducing overall performance levels in an attempt to reveal any possible detrimental effects. Experiment 3 ruled out 2 possible alternative explanations by demonstrating the typical part-list cuing impairment within this experimental context. It is concluded that the results challenge a strict version of the strategy disruption hypothesis.
三项实验评估了部分线索提示损伤的策略破坏解释的准确性。实验1表明，由于参与者自行选择的前向联想序列化检索策略受到显著破坏，回忆中没有出现记忆损害。实验2重复了实验1，同时降低了总体表现水平，以试图揭示任何可能的有害影响。实验3通过在该实验背景下证明典型的部分线索提示损伤，排除了两种可能的替代解释。得出的结论是，这些结果对策略破坏假设的严格版本提出了挑战。
