Rabbitt Patrick, Scott Marietta, Thacker Neil, Lowe Christine, Jackson Alan, Horan Mike, Pendleton Neil
Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre, University of Manchester.
Department of Radiology, University of Manchester.
Neuropsychology. 2006 Sep;20(5):549-557. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.5.549.
Age-related gross head size; adjusted age-related change in brain volume and carotid and basilar blood flow; as well as scores on 3 tests of fluid intelligence (gf), 2 tests of information-processing speed, 2 memory tests, and 3 tests of executive function were obtained from 69 volunteers aged from 62 to 84 years. Brain volume negatively predicted scores on all 10 cognitive tasks, accounting for up to 78% of age-related variance in scores on the speed tasks and on 1 executive task. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) negatively predicted scores on 8 cognitive tasks, accounting for up to 36% of age-related variance in speed scores. However, neither brain volume nor CBF accounted for significant age-related variance between individuals on any of 3 gf tests. We conclude that speed, but not gf, is an exceptionally sensitive behavioral index of the progress of gross brain changes that affect cognition in old age and that speed and gf do not reflect integrity of the same functional systems.
从69名年龄在62岁至84岁之间的志愿者身上获取了与年龄相关的总体头部大小、大脑体积以及颈动脉和基底动脉血流量的校正年龄相关变化,以及三项流体智力(gf)测试、两项信息处理速度测试、两项记忆测试和三项执行功能测试的分数。大脑体积对所有10项认知任务的分数有负向预测作用,在速度任务和一项执行任务的分数中,年龄相关差异的占比高达78%。脑血流量(CBF)对8项认知任务的分数有负向预测作用,在速度分数的年龄相关差异中占比高达36%。然而,在三项gf测试中的任何一项上,大脑体积和CBF都没有解释个体之间显著的年龄相关差异。我们得出结论,速度而非gf是影响老年认知的大脑总体变化进程的一个极其敏感的行为指标,并且速度和gf并不能反映相同功能系统的完整性。