Suppr超能文献

语言经验和刺激复杂性对音高方向分类感知的影响。

Effects of language experience and stimulus complexity on the categorical perception of pitch direction.

作者信息

Xu Yisheng, Gandour Jackson T, Francis Alexander L

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2038, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Aug;120(2):1063-74. doi: 10.1121/1.2213572.

Abstract

Whether or not categorical perception results from the operation of a special, language-specific, speech mode remains controversial. In this cross-language (Mandarin Chinese, English) study of the categorical nature of tone perception, we compared native Mandarin and English speakers' perception of a physical continuum of fundamental frequency contours ranging from a level to rising tone in both Mandarin speech and a homologous (nonspeech) harmonic tone. This design permits us to evaluate the effect of language experience by comparing Chinese and English groups; to determine whether categorical perception is speech-specific or domain-general by comparing speech to nonspeech stimuli for both groups; and to examine whether categorical perception involves a separate categorical process, distinct from regions of sensory discontinuity, by comparing speech to nonspeech stimuli for English listeners. Results show evidence of strong categorical perception of speech stimuli for Chinese but not English listeners. Categorical perception of nonspeech stimuli was comparable to that for speech stimuli for Chinese but weaker for English listeners, and perception of nonspeech stimuli was more categorical for English listeners than was perception of speech stimuli. These findings lead us to adopt a memory-based, multistore model of perception in which categorization is domain-general but influenced by long-term categorical representations.

摘要

范畴知觉是否源于一种特殊的、特定语言的言语模式的运作,这一点仍存在争议。在这项关于声调知觉范畴性质的跨语言(汉语普通话、英语)研究中,我们比较了以汉语普通话为母语者和以英语为母语者对一个基频轮廓物理连续统的知觉,该连续统范围从普通话语音中的平调到升调,以及一个同源(非语音)谐波声调。这种设计使我们能够通过比较汉语组和英语组来评估语言经验的影响;通过比较两组的语音刺激和非语音刺激,来确定范畴知觉是特定于言语还是通用领域的;通过比较英语听众的语音刺激和非语音刺激,来检验范畴知觉是否涉及一个与感觉不连续区域不同的单独范畴过程。结果表明,汉语听众对语音刺激有强烈的范畴知觉证据,而英语听众则没有。对于汉语听众,非语音刺激的范畴知觉与语音刺激相当,但对于英语听众则较弱,并且对于英语听众来说,非语音刺激的知觉比语音刺激更具范畴性。这些发现使我们采用一种基于记忆的多存储知觉模型,其中分类是通用领域的,但受长期范畴表征的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验