Widmalm S E, Brooks S L, Sano T, Upton L G, McKay D C
Department of Biological and Material Science, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078, USA.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Sep;35(5):334-8. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/23427399.
Many studies have shown that MRI findings are reliable when experienced calibrated observers work as a group. The hypothesis was that MRI findings can be used as the gold standard also when evaluation is made by single expert observers.
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) MRIs of 34 patients were evaluated independently by four reviewers with expert knowledge of radiology for the presence of 13 specified pathologic entities, as well as the quality of the images, on a 5-step scale from "Sure Yes" to "Sure No". Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to estimate the rating reliability of the examiners. A coefficient of at least 0.8 was deemed good, between 0.60 and 0.80 was deemed acceptable, and less than 0.60 was considered poor. Additionally, weighted kappa statistics were used for pair-wise comparisons across all four reviewers.
The hypothesis was not supported by the results. None of the 13 correlation coefficients for comparisons between single examiner evaluations of pathologic entities was good and 8 were poor.
A diagnosis of TMD based on MRI examination protocols made by a single examiner should not be accepted as a gold standard with regard to TMJ disorders.
许多研究表明,当经验丰富且经过校准的观察者团队进行评估时,MRI检查结果是可靠的。本研究的假设是,当由单一专家观察者进行评估时,MRI检查结果也可作为金标准。
34例患者的颞下颌关节(TMJ)MRI由四位具有放射学专业知识的审阅者独立评估,以确定13种特定病理实体的存在情况以及图像质量,采用从“肯定是”到“肯定不是”的5级评分标准。计算组内相关系数以评估检查者的评分可靠性。系数至少为0.8被认为良好,在0.60至0.80之间被认为可接受,小于0.60则被认为较差。此外,使用加权kappa统计量对所有四位审阅者进行两两比较。
结果不支持该假设。在单一检查者对病理实体的评估之间进行比较时,13个相关系数中没有一个是良好的,8个是较差的。
就颞下颌关节疾病而言,基于单一检查者制定的MRI检查方案对颞下颌关节紊乱病进行的诊断不应被视为金标准。