Suppr超能文献

一项关于全科医疗非工作时间护理环境中投诉管理的分析性观察研究:谁投诉、为何投诉以及我们对此能做些什么?

An analytic observational study on complaints management in the general practice out of hours care setting: who complains, why, and what can we do about it?

作者信息

Barragry Ruth A, Varadkar Leo E, Hanlon David K, Bailey Ken F, O'Dowd Tom C, O'Shea Brendan J

机构信息

TCD HSE GP Training Scheme, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland.

TCD Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 21;17:87. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0484-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

General Practice Co-Operatives provide most out of hours care in communities in Ireland. Limited data exists on patient complaints. This study reports on complaints at Kildare and West Wicklow Doctors on Call ('K Doc'), a GP Co-Operative in Ireland, examining the impact of a formal risk reduction strategy implemented (2010-2013). The aim of the study was to determine if it was possible to reduce the rate of written complaints per 1000 consultations through a formal approach encompassing evaluation of complaints, improved communication in relation to complaints, and more direct use of insights gained from complaints analysis in continuing professional development at the Co-Operative.

METHODS

Initially, complaints submitted over an 18 month period (01.06.08 to 31.12.09) were analysed. Complaint rate (number of complaints per 1000 consultations), complainant demographics, aspects of complaint response at the Co-Operative, and nature of complaint were recorded. Based on analysis, a risk reduction strategy was undertaken, including procedural change, focused training and education. Areas selected for improvement during a second phase of data collection included complaints rate, timeliness of Co-Operative response to complaint, and rate of complaint notification to patient's GP. Further analysis was then carried out over a 45 month period (01.01.10 to 30.09.13).

RESULTS

From 2008-2013, 216,716 patient consultations occurred. Complaints were received from 131 individuals, regarding 125 patients. Following introduction of risk reduction strategy, complaints rate reduced by 36 %, from 0.77 to 0.49 per 1000 consultations (p = 0.02) between the two periods of data collection. Timeliness of response from Co-Operative to the complainant improved from 63 % to 75 %. Notification of complaint to the patient's GP improved from 48 % to 96 %. Most complaints were not associated with medically significant events. The largest categories of complaint related to clinical care (55 % n = 69), cost (46 %, n = 58), communication (42 %, n = 53), and process of care (15 %, n = 19). Mothers of affluent paediatric patients were most likely to make formal complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports a statistically significant reduction in complaints rate of 36 % following introduction of risk reduction strategies at a GP Co -Operative. Out of hours consulting is known to be an area of high medical risk. Findings are of interest where number and costs of complaints against GPs are elsewhere reported to be rising, contributing to medical inflation, and to public concern.

摘要

背景

全科医疗合作社在爱尔兰社区提供大部分非工作时间的医疗服务。关于患者投诉的数据有限。本研究报告了爱尔兰一家全科医疗合作社基尔代尔和西威克洛随叫随到医生诊所(“K医生诊所”)的投诉情况,考察了2010年至2013年实施的一项正式风险降低策略的影响。该研究的目的是确定是否有可能通过一种正式方法降低每1000次诊疗的书面投诉率,这种方法包括投诉评估、改进投诉沟通以及在合作社的继续职业发展中更直接地运用从投诉分析中获得的见解。

方法

最初,对18个月期间(2008年6月1日至2009年12月31日)提交的投诉进行了分析。记录了投诉率(每1000次诊疗的投诉数量)、投诉者人口统计学特征、合作社对投诉的回应方面以及投诉性质。基于分析结果,采取了一项风险降低策略,包括程序变更、针对性培训和教育。在第二阶段数据收集期间选定进行改进的领域包括投诉率、合作社对投诉的回应及时性以及向患者全科医生通报投诉的比例。然后在45个月期间(2010年1月1日至2013年9月30日)进行了进一步分析。

结果

2008年至2013年期间,共进行了216,716次患者诊疗。收到131人针对125名患者的投诉。在引入风险降低策略后,两个数据收集期之间的投诉率从每1000次诊疗0.77降至0.49,降低了36%(p = 0.02)。合作社对投诉者的回应及时性从63%提高到75%。向患者全科医生通报投诉的比例从48%提高到96%。大多数投诉与具有重大医学意义的事件无关。投诉的最大类别与临床护理(55%,n = 69)、费用(46%,n = 58)、沟通(42%,n = 53)以及护理流程(15%,n = 19)有关。富裕儿科患者的母亲最有可能提出正式投诉。

结论

本研究报告称,一家全科医疗合作社引入风险降低策略后,投诉率在统计学上显著降低了36%。非工作时间诊疗已知是医疗高风险领域。在其他地方据报道针对全科医生的投诉数量和成本不断上升、导致医疗费用上涨并引发公众关注的情况下,这些研究结果具有重要意义。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Quality assessment in health.健康领域的质量评估
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 May 12;288(6428):1470-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6428.1470.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验