• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挑战助产护理、挑战助产士以及挑战整个体系。

Challenging midwifery care, challenging midwives and challenging the system.

作者信息

Homer Caroline S E

机构信息

Centre for Midwifery and Family Health, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia.

出版信息

Women Birth. 2006 Sep;19(3):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2006.07.002
PMID:16949355
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to generate debate and discussion about the state of midwifery services in Australia today. While numerous reports have been published that highlight what women want in maternity care, widespread change has not occurred. This paper presents the story of Alice (a real woman with a fictitious name). Alice's story highlights the challenges that women face in dealing with a system that is often inflexible. While the health systems, and those who work within them, usually have the best intentions to try to provide the type of care that women want, they are not always successful. The paper summarises the evidence and support for models of continuity of midwifery care and outlines a series of strategies to ensure that change can occur. Finally, the paper challenges all midwives to work towards widespread, system-level change in Australian maternity services.

摘要

本文的目的是引发关于当今澳大利亚助产服务状况的辩论和讨论。尽管已经发表了大量报告,强调了女性在孕产护理方面的需求,但广泛的变革尚未发生。本文讲述了爱丽丝(化名的真实女性)的故事。爱丽丝的故事凸显了女性在应对一个往往缺乏灵活性的系统时所面临的挑战。虽然卫生系统以及其中的工作人员通常怀着最美好的意愿,试图提供女性想要的护理类型,但他们并非总能成功。本文总结了助产护理连续性模式的证据和支持,并概述了一系列确保变革能够发生的策略。最后,本文向所有助产士提出挑战,要求他们努力推动澳大利亚孕产服务在系统层面的广泛变革。

相似文献

1
Challenging midwifery care, challenging midwives and challenging the system.挑战助产护理、挑战助产士以及挑战整个体系。
Women Birth. 2006 Sep;19(3):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
2
Reducing length of stay for women who present as outpatients to delivery suite: A clinical practice improvement project.减少作为门诊患者到分娩套房的女性的住院时间:临床实践改进项目。
Women Birth. 2009 Dec;22(4):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
3
Women and birth.女性与分娩。
Women Birth. 2007 Jun;20(2):39-40. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 7.
4
'With woman' philosophy: examining the evidence, answering the questions.“与女性相关”的理念:审视证据,回答问题。
Nurs Inq. 2007 Jun;14(2):140-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2007.00360.x.
5
Responding to the changing landscape: Australian midwifery.应对不断变化的形势:澳大利亚的助产护理
Pract Midwife. 2012 Dec;15(11):24-6.
6
Interprofessional collaboration supports women who choose midwifery care.
Can Nurse. 2008 Jun;104(6):8, 10.
7
The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour.出生地和护理模式对分娩期妇女管理中助产实践的影响。
Women Birth. 2006 Dec;19(4):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
8
Manisha's birth experience.玛尼莎的分娩经历。
Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2010(96):60, 69.
9
Cross cultural birth: it's a human rights issue.跨文化生育:这是一个人权问题。
Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2011 Spring(97):60-1.
10
An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part II: women's satisfaction.助产士团体执业评估。第二部分:女性的满意度。
Women Birth. 2009 Mar;22(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Can a midwife-led continuity model improve maternal services in a low-resource setting? A non-randomised cluster intervention study in Palestine.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式能否改善资源匮乏地区的孕产妇服务?巴勒斯坦的一项非随机整群干预研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 22;8(3):e019568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019568.
2
Women's reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section.剖宫产术后选择在家分娩的女性的原因及经历。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 3;15:206. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0639-4.
3
Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.
针对女性的群组式与传统产前护理对比研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;2015(2):CD007622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3.