Engh C Anderson, Stepniewski Adam S, Ginn Stuart D, Beykirch Sarah E, Sychterz-Terefenko Christi J, Hopper Robert H, Engh Charles A
Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.002.
Cross-linked liners were introduced with the promise that they would substantially reduce polyethylene wear. In 1999, our institution initiated a prospective study to compare the outcome of total hip arthroplasty patients who were randomized to non-cross-linked Enduron liners with that of total hip arthroplasty patients who were randomized to Marathon polyethylene liners that had been cross-linked with 5 Mrad (50 kGy) of gamma-irradiation and heat-treated to eliminate free radicals. At a mean follow-up of 5.7 years, the clinical outcomes among the Marathon and Enduron liners were similar. However, the mean wear rate was 0.01 +/- 0.07 mm/y for the Marathon group, which represents a 95% reduction compared with the mean wear rate of 0.19 +/- 0.12 mm/y for the Enduron group. In addition, the incidence of osteolysis was lower in the Marathon group.
交联内衬的推出是为了大幅减少聚乙烯磨损。1999年,我们机构开展了一项前瞻性研究,比较随机分配至非交联Enduron内衬的全髋关节置换患者与随机分配至经5兆拉德(50千戈瑞)γ射线辐照交联并经热处理以消除自由基的Marathon聚乙烯内衬的全髋关节置换患者的结局。平均随访5.7年时,Marathon和Enduron内衬的临床结局相似。然而,Marathon组的平均磨损率为0.01±0.07毫米/年,与Enduron组0.19±0.12毫米/年的平均磨损率相比降低了95%。此外,Marathon组的骨溶解发生率较低。