• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种高交联聚乙烯衬垫在全髋关节置换术中的不同磨损:EBRA 磨损分析。

Different wear in two highly cross-linked polyethylene liners in THA: wear analysis with EBRA.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Experimental Orthopaedics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Sonnenburgstrasse 16, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Sep;141(9):1591-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03832-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-021-03832-0
PMID:33661385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8354953/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was (1) to compare early wear rates in bedding-in periods of two highly cross-linked polyethylene liners frequently used in THA and (2) to evaluate risk factors indicating a possible higher wear rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1120 patients who received a Crossfire or a Marathon highly cross-linked (HXLPE) ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liner in primary THA at our Department between 2004 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with (1) only alumina heads on HXLPE acetabular bearings, (2) a minimum of four radiographs per patient for EBRA analysis, (3) no osteolysis around the acetabular cup and (4) no dislocations that occurred during the study period were included.

RESULTS

A total of 328 patients (female: 183; male: 145; Marathon: 179; Crossfire: 149) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 24 (range 7-51) months. With 0.22 (SD 0.27) mm mean total wear for the Marathon was three times greater than for the Crossfire, namely 0.07 (SD 0.14) mm. Mean cup migration during the investigated follow-up period was 0.7 (SD 0.8) mm for the Pinnacle and 0.5 mm (SD 0.7) for the Trident PSL cups.

CONCLUSION

Initial early wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in combination with alumina heads differs strongly between products. Long-term survivorship of these liners should be observed to determine whether early wear has an impact on aseptic loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (retrospective comparative study with prospective cohort).

摘要

简介

本研究的目的是:(1) 比较两种常用于全髋关节置换术(THA)的高交联聚乙烯衬垫在磨合期间的早期磨损率;(2) 评估表明可能存在更高磨损率的风险因素。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 2004 年至 2018 年期间我科收治的 1120 例接受 Crossfire 或 Marathon 高交联(HXLPE)超高分子量聚乙烯衬垫初次 THA 的患者。纳入标准为:(1) HXLPE 髋臼轴承仅为氧化铝头;(2) 每位患者至少有 4 张射线照片进行 EBRA 分析;(3) 髋臼杯周围无溶骨;(4) 研究期间无脱位。

结果

共 328 例患者(女性 183 例,男性 145 例;Marathon 179 例,Crossfire 149 例)符合纳入标准。平均随访时间为 24 个月(7-51 个月)。Marathon 的平均总磨损率为 0.22(SD 0.27)mm,是 Crossfire 的三倍,即 0.07(SD 0.14)mm。在研究期间,Pinnacle 的髋臼杯平均迁移量为 0.7(SD 0.8)mm,Trident PSL 髋臼杯为 0.5mm(SD 0.7)mm。

结论

高交联聚乙烯与氧化铝头的初始早期磨损在不同产品之间存在显著差异。这些衬垫的长期存活率应得到观察,以确定早期磨损是否会影响无菌性松动。

证据等级

III 级(前瞻性队列研究)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/f7bc3997a174/402_2021_3832_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/f5504cd33a4c/402_2021_3832_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/34ad34c287dd/402_2021_3832_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/ff3839d731f4/402_2021_3832_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/eb6683a6180a/402_2021_3832_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/f7bc3997a174/402_2021_3832_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/f5504cd33a4c/402_2021_3832_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/34ad34c287dd/402_2021_3832_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/ff3839d731f4/402_2021_3832_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/eb6683a6180a/402_2021_3832_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3518/8354953/f7bc3997a174/402_2021_3832_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Different wear in two highly cross-linked polyethylene liners in THA: wear analysis with EBRA.两种高交联聚乙烯衬垫在全髋关节置换术中的不同磨损:EBRA 磨损分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Sep;141(9):1591-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03832-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Thin highly cross-linked polyethylene liners combined with large femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty show excellent survival and low wear rates at a mean follow-up of 12.8 years.在初次全髋关节置换术中,薄的高度交联聚乙烯内衬与大股骨头相结合,在平均12.8年的随访中显示出优异的生存率和低磨损率。
Bone Joint J. 2023 Jan;105-B(1):29-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B1.BJJ-2022-0812.R1.
3
Fifteen-Year Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty With Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years and Less.50 岁及以下患者钴铬合金股骨头在超交联聚乙烯上的全髋关节置换术 15 年结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.071. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
4
No Revisions Attributable to Wear of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liners: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.无因高交联聚乙烯衬垫磨损导致的翻修:一项长期随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S347-S352. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.042. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
5
Results of primary THA using 36 mm femoral heads on first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients less than 60 years of age: Minimum 10-year follow-ups.第一代高度交联聚乙烯在60岁以下患者中使用36毫米股骨头进行初次全髋关节置换术的结果:至少10年随访
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(1):2309499019896448. doi: 10.1177/2309499019896448.
6
Highly cross-linked polyethylene decreases the rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene at 13 years' follow-up.在13年的随访中,与传统聚乙烯相比,高度交联聚乙烯降低了全髋关节置换术的翻修率。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1):28-32. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36527.
7
Large Femoral Heads With Small Acetabular Components: An Examination of 10-Year Polyethylene Wear.大股骨头配小髋臼组件:10 年聚乙烯磨损研究
Orthopedics. 2024 Mar-Apr;47(2):118-122. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20230804-07. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
8
The concept of a cementless isoelastic monoblock cup made of highly cross-linked polyethylene infused with vitamin E: radiological analyses of migration and wear using EBRA and clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up.一种由高度交联聚乙烯注入维生素 E 制成的无水泥弹性单体杯的概念:使用 EBRA 进行迁移和磨损的放射学分析以及中期随访的临床结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 23;22(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03981-8.
9
Do screws and screw holes affect osteolysis in cementless cups using highly crosslinked polyethylene? A 7 to 10-year follow-up case-control study.螺钉和螺孔是否会影响使用超交联聚乙烯的非骨水泥杯的骨溶解?一项 7 至 10 年随访的病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 May;104(3):307-315. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
Low wear rates seen in THAs with highly crosslinked polyethylene at 9 to 14 years in patients younger than age 50 years.在年龄小于50岁的患者中,高度交联聚乙烯的全髋关节置换术在9至14年时磨损率较低。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3829-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4422-7.

本文引用的文献

1
High risk of hip dislocation following polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty-is cup revision necessary?全髋关节置换术后行聚乙烯衬垫翻修术髋关节脱位风险高——是否需要行髋臼翻修术?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1837-1845. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03603-3. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
2
Accuracy of EBRA-cup measurements after reconstruction of severe acetabular defects at revision THR.翻修 THR 时严重髋臼缺损重建后 EBRA-cup 测量的准确性。
J Orthop Res. 2020 Jul;38(7):1497-1505. doi: 10.1002/jor.24623. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Polyethylene Liner and Femoral Head Exchange in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Factors Associated with Long-Term Success and Failure.
全髋关节置换术中聚乙烯衬垫和股骨头的翻修:与长期成功和失败相关的因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):421-428. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00522.
4
Are Radiographic and Direct Measures of Acetabular Polyethylene Wear Comparable?髋臼聚乙烯磨损的放射学和直接测量值是否具有可比性?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2677-2683. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.047. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
Otto Aufranc Award: Crosslinking Reduces THA Wear, Osteolysis, and Revision Rates at 15-year Followup Compared With Noncrosslinked Polyethylene.奥托·奥夫兰克奖:与非交联聚乙烯相比,交联聚乙烯在15年随访时可降低全髋关节置换术的磨损、骨溶解和翻修率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):279-290. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000036.
6
Wear rate and medium-term survival of a cemented, moderately cross-linked polyethylene acetabular prosthesis.
Hip Int. 2018 Jan;28(1):53-58. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000521.
7
Thirteen-year wear rate comparison of highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial.全髋关节置换术中高交联聚乙烯与传统聚乙烯的13年磨损率比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的长期随访
Can J Surg. 2017 Jun;60(3):212-216. doi: 10.1503/cjs.005216.
8
Accuracy of methods to measure femoral head penetration within metal-backed acetabular components.测量金属背衬髋臼组件内股骨头穿透情况的方法的准确性。
J Orthop Res. 2017 May;35(5):988-996. doi: 10.1002/jor.23356. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
9
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component.保留髋臼部件的全髋关节翻修术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 18;96(12):1015-1020. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01177.
10
Fixation and wear with a contemporary acetabular component and cross-linked polyethylene at minimum 10-year follow-up.在至少 10 年的随访中,使用现代髋臼组件和交联聚乙烯的固定和磨损情况。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Oct;29(10):1961-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 15.