Suppr超能文献

眼毒理学:德莱兹眼试验

Ocular toxicology: the Draize eye test.

作者信息

Secchi Antonio, Deligianni Velika

机构信息

University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Oct;6(5):367-72. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000244798.26110.00.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Superficial ocular tissues are frequently exposed to damage produced by chemical compounds applied on or around the ocular surface for cosmetic, therapeutic or accidental reasons. An experimental test measuring objectively and in a reproducible way any potential damaging effect would certainly help in prospectively minimizing unwanted effects. The Draize eye test, although commonly employed to date, does not seem to be quite satisfactory in this respect.

RECENT FINDINGS

The limits of the Draize eye test and the results of some modified versions of the test are analysed. In particular, the good predictivity of the so-called low-volume Draize eye test and the recent findings of studies on the in-vitro and ex-vivo alternatives to the Draize eye test are presented.

SUMMARY

The Draize eye test, despite criticisms, has been used in the clinical setting for a long time and still remains the reference protocol. To date, only a combination of alternative methods, none of which is devoid of serious criticisms, seems to be able to exhaustively recognize potential irritants and avoiding for that purpose, in some cases, the use of living animals.

摘要

综述目的

由于美容、治疗或意外原因,眼表浅层组织经常会受到涂抹在眼表或其周围的化合物所造成的损伤。一种能够客观且可重复地测量任何潜在损伤效应的实验测试,肯定有助于前瞻性地将不良影响降至最低。尽管迄今为止常用Draize眼试验,但在这方面它似乎并不十分令人满意。

最新发现

分析了Draize眼试验的局限性以及该试验一些改良版本的结果。特别介绍了所谓小容量Draize眼试验的良好预测性,以及Draize眼试验体外和离体替代方法研究的最新发现。

总结

Draize眼试验尽管备受批评,但长期以来一直在临床环境中使用,仍然是参考方案。迄今为止,只有替代方法的组合(其中没有一种没有严重批评)似乎能够全面识别潜在刺激物,并在某些情况下为此目的避免使用活体动物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验