• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[微创食管切除术]

[Minimally invasive esophagectomy].

作者信息

Elorza-Orúe José L, Larburu-Etxaniz Santiago, Asensio-Gallego José Ignacio, Enríquez-Navascués José María, Echenique-Elizondo Miguel

机构信息

Sección de Cirugía Esofagogástrica, Hospital Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, España.

出版信息

Cir Esp. 2006 Sep;80(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(06)70943-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0009-739x(06)70943-5
PMID:16956550
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the bases for the treatment of esophageal cancer are surgical resection and chemotherapy. Among the various surgical techniques used, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) aims to reduce surgical aggression and cardiopulmonary complications while maintaining basic oncological principles. We present the results of our initial experience with this technique in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Fourteen patients with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer were selected to undergo MIE in three stages: right thoracoscopy, laparoscopy, and left cervicotomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Histological diagnosis was epidermoid carcinoma (n = 11) and high grade dysplasia (n = 3), one of which was highly suspicious of malignant transformation. After extension studies, preoperative clinical stages were as follows: stage 0 (n = 3), stage IIA (n = 10), and stage III (n = 1). Seven patients were treated with chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy and the remainder underwent surgery without prior treatment.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 299 minutes (range: 195-425). The conversion rate was 14% (n = 2). Mortality was 0% and morbidity was 50%, consisting of three major complications and four minor complications. No anastomotic dehiscence or wound infections were observed. Complete (R0) resections were achieved in 92.8% (n = 13). Transfusion needs were 1.1 U/patient. The mean number of nodes removed was 10.2/patient (range: 5-17). The mean length of hospital stay was 21 days (range: 9-64). Postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 to 17 months. All patients were alive and disease-free except for one patient with liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MIE is a demanding technique, we believe that it is technically feasible in the treatment of esophageal cancer with acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality. Consequently, it should be considered as an alternative to open surgery in selected patients.

摘要

引言

目前,食管癌的治疗基础是手术切除和化疗。在使用的各种手术技术中,微创食管切除术(MIE)旨在减少手术创伤和心肺并发症,同时维持基本的肿瘤学原则。我们展示了我们在食管癌治疗中首次使用该技术的经验结果。

材料与方法

选择14例诊断为食管癌的患者分三个阶段进行MIE:右胸镜检查、腹腔镜检查以及左颈部切开术并进行颈部食管胃吻合术。组织学诊断为表皮样癌(n = 11)和高级别异型增生(n = 3),其中1例高度怀疑恶变。经过进一步检查,术前临床分期如下:0期(n = 3),IIA期(n = 10),III期(n = 1)。7例患者接受了化疗和新辅助放疗,其余患者未接受术前治疗直接接受手术。

结果

平均手术时间为299分钟(范围:195 - 425分钟)。中转率为14%(n = 2)。死亡率为0%,发病率为50%,包括3例主要并发症和4例次要并发症。未观察到吻合口裂开或伤口感染。92.8%(n = 13)的患者实现了根治性(R0)切除。每位患者的输血量为1.1单位。每位患者平均切除的淋巴结数量为10.2个(范围:5 - 17个)。平均住院时间为21天(范围:9 - 64天)。术后随访时间为1至17个月。除1例有肝转移的患者外,所有患者均存活且无疾病。

结论

尽管MIE是一项要求较高的技术,但我们认为它在治疗食管癌方面技术上是可行的,术后发病率和死亡率可接受。因此,在选定的患者中应将其视为开放手术的替代方案。

相似文献

1
[Minimally invasive esophagectomy].[微创食管切除术]
Cir Esp. 2006 Sep;80(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(06)70943-5.
2
[Transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy using minimally invasive techniques. Experience in 50 patients].
Cir Esp. 2008 Apr;83(4):180-5. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(08)70544-x.
3
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?癌症的微创食管切除术:腹腔镜经裂孔手术还是俯卧位胸腔镜手术继以腹腔镜手术?
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9697-7. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
4
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.微创食管切除术:104例手术的经验教训
Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1081-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b72b5.
6
Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.远端食管癌和胃食管交界癌全微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术的技术及短期疗效:来自六个欧洲中心的汇总数据
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):119-126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4938-2. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
7
Minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy: lessons learned.微创经裂孔食管切除术:经验教训
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1190-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9312-y. Epub 2007 May 4.
8
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Lateral-prone Position: Experience of 226 Cases.侧俯卧位微创食管切除术:226例经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Feb;26(1):60-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000225.
9
[Clinical application of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma].微创食管癌切除术在临床上的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):947-9.
10
Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.腹腔镜联合胸腔镜 Ivor Lewis 食管癌切除术:来自中国的初步经验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Apr;125(8):1376-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the outcomes between thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy via retrosternal and prevertebral lifting paths by the same surgeon.同一术者经胸骨后和椎前路径行胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管切除术的结局比较。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug 30;15(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1219-z.
2
Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for middle or lower esophageal carcinoma.腹腔镜联合胸腔镜下胸内吻合术治疗中下段食管癌。
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Sep;6(9):1354-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.07.38.