Rachlin Howard
Psychology Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Sep;90 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
Rationality is here considered from a functional viewpoint: How may the concept of rationality be best used in talking about addictive behavior? The article considers rationality in terms of overt behavioral patterns rather than as a smoothly operating logic mechanism in the head. The economic notion of rationality as consistency in choice - the property of exponential time discount functions - is examined and rejected. Addicts are not irrational because of the type of time discount function that governs their choices-or even because of the steepness of that function. Instead, rationality is here conceived as a pattern of predicting your own future behavior and acting upon those predictions to maximize reinforcement in the long run. Addicts are irrational to the extent that they fail to make such predictions and to take such actions.
在谈论成瘾行为时,如何才能最好地运用合理性这一概念?本文是从公开的行为模式而非头脑中平稳运作的逻辑机制的角度来考量合理性的。文章审视并否定了将合理性视为选择一致性的经济学概念——指数时间贴现函数的特性。成瘾者并非因为支配其选择的时间贴现函数类型——甚至也不是因为该函数的陡峭程度——而丧失理性。相反,合理性在这里被理解为一种预测自身未来行为并依据这些预测采取行动以从长远来看使强化最大化的模式。成瘾者在未能做出此类预测并采取此类行动的程度上是不理性的。