Suppr超能文献

在胸部体模中对6兆伏光子束进行蒙特卡罗剂量计算。

Monte Carlo dose calculations for a 6-MV photon beam in a thorax phantom.

作者信息

Farajollahi Alireza, Mesbahi Asghar

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, Medical Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Radiat Med. 2006 May;24(4):269-76. doi: 10.1007/s11604-005-1493-5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In this study we evaluated the accuracy of the Monte Carlo (MC) and effective path length (EPL) methods for dose calculations in the inhomogeneous thorax phantom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Philips SL 75/5 linear accelerator head was modeled using the MCNP4C Monte Carlo code. An anatomic inhomogeneous thorax phantom was irradiated with a 6-MV photon beam, and the doses along points of the central axis of the beam were measured by a small ionization chamber. The central axis relative dose was calculated by the MCNP4C code and the EPL method in a conventional treatment planning system. The results of calculations and measurements were compared.

RESULTS

For all measured points on the thorax phantom the results of the MC method were in agreement with the actual measurement (local difference was less than 2%). For the EPL method, the amount of error was dependent on the field size and the point location in the phantom. The maximum error was +19.5 and +26.8 for field sizes of 10 x 10 and 5 x 5 cm2 for lateral irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed large, unacceptable errors for EPL calculations in the lung for both field sizes. The accuracy of the MC method was better than the recommended value of 3%. Thus, application of this method is strongly recommended for lung dose calculations, especially for small field sizes.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们评估了蒙特卡罗(MC)方法和有效路径长度(EPL)方法在非均匀胸部体模中进行剂量计算的准确性。

材料与方法

使用MCNP4C蒙特卡罗代码对飞利浦SL 75/5直线加速器机头进行建模。用6兆伏光子束照射一个解剖学上非均匀的胸部体模,并用一个小电离室测量沿束中心轴各点的剂量。在传统治疗计划系统中,通过MCNP4C代码和EPL方法计算中心轴相对剂量。比较计算结果和测量结果。

结果

对于胸部体模上所有测量点,MC方法的结果与实际测量结果一致(局部差异小于2%)。对于EPL方法,误差量取决于射野大小和体模中的点位置。对于侧向照射,射野大小为10×10和5×5平方厘米时,最大误差分别为+19.5和+26.8。

结论

我们的研究表明,对于两种射野大小,EPL方法在肺部计算中存在较大的、不可接受的误差。MC方法的准确性优于推荐的3%的值。因此,强烈推荐将该方法应用于肺部剂量计算,尤其是对于小射野大小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验