Aldaba Mikel A, Linhares João M M, Pinto Paulo D, Nascimento Sérgio M C, Amano Kinjiro, Foster David H
Department of Physics, Minho University, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal.
Vis Neurosci. 2006 May-Aug;23(3-4):555-9. doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233467.
Simple color-difference formulae and pictorial images have traditionally been used to estimate the visual impact of color errors introduced by image-reproduction processes. But the limited gamut of RGB cameras constrains such analyses, particularly of natural scenes. The purpose of this work was to estimate visual sensitivity to color errors introduced deliberately into pictures synthesized from hyperspectral images of natural scenes without gamut constraints and to compare discrimination thresholds expressed in CIELAB and S-CIELAB color spaces. From each original image, a set of approximate images with variable color errors were generated and displayed on a calibrated RGB color monitor. The threshold for perceptibility of the errors was determined in a paired-comparison experiment. In agreement with previous studies, it was found that discrimination between original and approximate images needed on average a CIELAB color difference DeltaEab* of about 2.2. Although a large variation of performance across the nine images tested was found when errors were expressed in CIELAB units, little variation was obtained when they were expressed in S-CIELAB units.
传统上,简单的色差公式和图像已被用于估计图像复制过程中引入的颜色误差的视觉影响。但RGB相机有限的色域限制了此类分析,尤其是对自然场景的分析。这项工作的目的是估计对故意引入由自然场景的高光谱图像合成的、无色域限制的图片中的颜色误差的视觉敏感度,并比较在CIELAB和S-CIELAB颜色空间中表示的辨别阈值。从每幅原始图像中,生成一组具有可变颜色误差的近似图像,并显示在校准过的RGB彩色显示器上。在配对比较实验中确定误差的可感知阈值。与先前的研究一致,发现原始图像和近似图像之间的辨别平均需要约2.2的CIELAB色差ΔEab*。尽管当误差用CIELAB单位表示时,在所测试的九幅图像中发现性能有很大差异,但当用S-CIELAB单位表示时,差异很小。