Cruz García Gisella Susana
Social Sciences Department, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006 Sep 12;2:39. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-2-39.
This study focuses on the mother-child nexus (or process of enculturation) with respect to knowledge and valuation of wild food plants in a context where accelerated processes of modernization and acculturation are leading to the erosion of knowledge and cultural values associated with wild food plant use, in Wayanad, Western Ghats, India. Wild food plants in this biodiversity hotspot form an important part of local diets and are used as famine foods and medicines. In general, the collection and consumption of these foods are increasingly stigmatized as symbols of poverty and 'tribalness' (equivalent to 'backwardness'). The study, which falls within the discipline of ethnobotany, involves three socio-cultural groups--the Paniya and Kuruma tribes and non-tribals. Further, it examines the impact in the enculturation process of an unusual educational programme sponsored by the MS Swaminathan Research Foundation that is oriented towards creating awareness among children of cultural identity and local biological resources--the study compares children having participated in the programme with those who have not, with their mothers. The process of enculturation is assessed by comparing wild food plant knowledge and values between mothers and their children, and by examining events where knowledge transmission occurs, including collection and consumption. For that, quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis tools were used, and methods included semi-structured interviews, photo identification and informal interviews of key informants. Results ratify that women are the knowledge holders and are the primary means of knowledge transmission to their children. Nevertheless, fewer children are collecting wild food plants with mothers and learning about them, apparently because of children's lack of time. On the other hand, older people acknowledge that a "change in taste" is occurring among younger generations. In general, there is a simultaneous transmission from mothers to children of contrasting values pertaining to wild food plants: that they are 'good food' but also that they are symbols of low status and poverty, leading to feelings of shame and inferiority. Finally, the study concludes that the educational programme, through a "learning by doing" approach counteracts social stigma and encourages learning among children of all ages and socio-cultural groups, particularly stimulating non-tribal children to learn from tribals.
本研究聚焦于印度西高止山脉韦亚纳德地区的母子关系(或文化传承过程),该地区现代化和文化适应进程加速,导致与野生食用植物利用相关的知识和文化价值受到侵蚀。在这个生物多样性热点地区,野生食用植物是当地饮食的重要组成部分,还被用作饥荒食物和药物。总体而言,这些食物的采集和食用越来越被视为贫困和“部落性”(等同于“落后”)的象征而遭人诟病。这项属于民族植物学学科范畴的研究涉及三个社会文化群体——帕尼亚部落、库鲁马部落和非部落群体。此外,该研究考察了由MS斯瓦米纳坦研究基金会发起的一个不同寻常的教育项目在文化传承过程中的影响,该项目旨在提高儿童对文化身份和当地生物资源的认识——研究将参与该项目的儿童及其母亲与未参与项目的儿童及其母亲进行了比较。通过比较母亲和孩子之间关于野生食用植物的知识和价值观,并考察知识传播发生的事件,包括采集和食用,来评估文化传承过程。为此,使用了定量和定性的数据收集与分析工具,方法包括半结构化访谈、照片识别以及对关键信息提供者的非正式访谈。结果证实,女性是知识的持有者,也是向孩子传授知识的主要途径。然而,越来越少的孩子与母亲一起采集野生食用植物并了解它们,显然是因为孩子们缺乏时间。另一方面,老年人承认年轻一代正在发生“口味变化”。总体而言,母亲在向孩子传递关于野生食用植物的相互矛盾的价值观:它们是“好食物”,但也是低地位和贫困的象征,会导致羞耻感和自卑感。最后,该研究得出结论,该教育项目通过“边做边学”的方法消除了社会污名,鼓励了所有年龄和社会文化群体的儿童学习,尤其促使非部落儿童向部落儿童学习。