Frampton Richard, Page Marianne, Thomas Pete
Vehicle Safety Research Centre, Loughborough University, UK.
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2006;50:35-56.
Despite considerable improvements in frontal impact crashworthiness, frontal crashes still account for a major number of front seat occupant fatalities in Great Britain. This study attempted to determine the remaining potential for further fatality reduction with passive safety improvements in frontal crashes. No evidence was found to support an increase in crash test speeds. Instead, assessment of scope for survival showed that at least 27% of all fatal drivers and 39% of all fatal front seat passengers have survival potential given attention to older occupant's chest injury tolerance and passenger compartment intrusion under 60 km/h. Considering only fatal frontal crashes that might be assessed with a barrier test, showed an estimated survival potential of at least 49% of belted drivers and 60% of belted front seat passengers. The high proportion of unbelted fatalities suggested that targeting unbelted occupant protection could have additional benefit.
尽管正面碰撞安全性有了显著提高,但在英国,正面碰撞仍导致大量前排座位乘客死亡。本研究试图确定通过正面碰撞被动安全改进措施进一步降低死亡率的剩余潜力。未发现支持提高碰撞测试速度的证据。相反,生存可能性评估表明,在关注老年乘客胸部损伤耐受性以及车速低于60公里/小时时乘客舱侵入情况的前提下,至少27%的致命驾驶员和39%的致命前排乘客有生存潜力。仅考虑那些可以通过台车试验评估的致命正面碰撞,结果显示,系安全带的驾驶员估计至少有49%的生存潜力,系安全带的前排乘客则为60%。未系安全带导致的死亡比例很高,这表明针对未系安全带乘客的保护措施可能会带来额外的益处。