King Abby C, Toobert Deborah, Ahn David, Resnicow Ken, Coday Mace, Riebe Deborah, Garber Carol E, Hurtz Shannon, Morton Jessica, Sallis James F
Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 211 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305-5705, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(1):24-35. doi: 10.1177/089011710602100106.
Few studies have explored how relationships of perceived environment and physical activity vary across different activity domains and populations. This question was explored in five physical activity intervention trials funded by the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium.
Observational.
San Francisco peninsula, California (N = 94); Eugene, Oregon (N = 122); Atlanta, Georgia (N = 256); Kingston, Rhode Island (N = 109); Memphis, Tennessee (N = 64).
Ethnically diverse community adults ages 18 to 85 years.
The Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale and CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire. Response rate among those invited to complete these measures was 90%.
Cross-sectional pooled signal detection analysis indicated that people who reported living in neighborhoods with more attractive scenery and ease of walking were more likely to meet national physical activity recommendations (67%) compared with those without these neighborhood attributes (36%; chi2 = 13.04, p = .0003). Within-site multiple regression identified two additional variables--seeing others when walking and encountering loose dogs that make it difficult to walk--as correlates across multiple sites and activity domains (i.e., minutes of weekly moderate or more vigorous activity, walking for errands, walking leisurely) (incremental R2 = 2.0-7.5; p < .05). Analyses of covariance suggested that traffic safety might be particularly important in facilitating or impeding physical activity in response to a formal intervention (for traffic-arm assignment interactions, F = 3.8-7.0, p < or = .05).
Relationships between perceived environments and physical activity may differ depending upon population groups and activity domains and merit investigation by using stronger prospective designs.
很少有研究探讨感知环境与身体活动之间的关系在不同活动领域和人群中是如何变化的。美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟资助的五项身体活动干预试验对这一问题进行了探究。
观察性研究。
加利福尼亚州旧金山半岛(N = 94);俄勒冈州尤金市(N = 122);佐治亚州亚特兰大市(N = 256);罗德岛州金斯敦(N = 109);田纳西州孟菲斯市(N = 64)。
18至85岁的不同种族社区成年人。
邻里环境步行适宜性量表和CHAMPS身体活动问卷。受邀完成这些测量的人的回复率为90%。
横断面汇总信号检测分析表明,报告居住在风景更优美、步行更便利社区的人,与没有这些社区特征的人相比,更有可能达到国家身体活动建议标准(67%对36%;卡方 = 13.04,p = 0.0003)。现场多元回归确定了另外两个变量——步行时看到他人以及遇到 loose dogs(此处原文有误,可能是loose dogs,意为散放的狗)导致行走困难——作为多个地点和活动领域的相关因素(即每周中等强度或更强强度活动的分钟数、步行办事、悠闲散步)(增量R2 = 2.0 - 7.5;p < 0.05)。协方差分析表明,交通安全在促进或阻碍身体活动以响应正式干预方面可能尤为重要(对于交通组分配交互作用,F = 3.8 - 7.0,p ≤ 0.05)。
感知环境与身体活动之间的关系可能因人群组和活动领域而异,值得采用更强有力的前瞻性设计进行研究。