Suppr超能文献

六种不同根管封闭剂的体视显微镜下染料渗漏测量

Stereomicroscopic Dye Leakage Measurement of Six Different Root Canal Sealers.

作者信息

Ballullaya Srinidhi V, Vinay Vusurumarthi, Thumu Jayaprakash, Devalla Srihari, Bollu Indira Priyadarshini, Balla Sagarika

机构信息

Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Postgraduate student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZC65-ZC68. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25780.10077. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hermetic sealing of the root canal is the most desirable outcome of any root canal treatment, but almost always the filling of the root canal is defective, which is a multifactorial outcome. One such factor majorly influencing the obturation is the root canal sealer used.

AIM

The present study was done for evaluating microleakage in different root canal sealers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty extracted human single rooted teeeth were used in this in-vitro study. Sealers tested for microleakage in this study were zinc oxide eugenol based sealer, Sealapex, AH Plus, MTA Plus, EndoRez, Endosequence BC. All the specimens were examined under stereomicroscope for microleakage and the obtained data were statistically analysed using One-way ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple comparision tests using the software GraphPad Prism 7.02.

RESULTS

The Endosequence BC group showed the least dye leakage and the highest leakage was seen in Zinc oxide Eugenol based sealer.

CONCLUSION

Bio ceramic salers being hydrophilic show better sealing ability compared to resin based and eugenol based sealers.

摘要

引言

根管的严密封闭是任何根管治疗最理想的结果,但根管充填几乎总是存在缺陷,这是一个多因素导致的结果。其中一个主要影响充填效果的因素是所使用的根管封闭剂。

目的

本研究旨在评估不同根管封闭剂的微渗漏情况。

材料与方法

本体外研究使用了60颗拔除的人单根牙。本研究中测试微渗漏的封闭剂有氧化锌丁香酚类封闭剂、Sealapex、AH Plus、MTA Plus、EndoRez、Endosequence BC。所有标本在体视显微镜下检查微渗漏情况,所得数据使用GraphPad Prism 7.02软件进行单因素方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验进行统计学分析。

结果

Endosequence BC组显示出最少的染料渗漏,而氧化锌丁香酚类封闭剂的渗漏最多。

结论

与树脂类和丁香酚类封闭剂相比,亲水性的生物陶瓷封闭剂显示出更好的封闭能力。

相似文献

1
Stereomicroscopic Dye Leakage Measurement of Six Different Root Canal Sealers.六种不同根管封闭剂的体视显微镜下染料渗漏测量
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZC65-ZC68. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25780.10077. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
5
Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers.5种根管封闭剂的物理性能
J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

2
Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Different Endodontic Sealers - An Study.不同根管充填封闭剂根尖封闭能力的比较——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S513-S515. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_468_25. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
8
Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.牙髓封闭剂和粘固剂的生物学特性与溶解性
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 Jun 4;11:40863. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

8
Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers.5种根管封闭剂的物理性能
J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验