• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六种不同根管封闭剂的体视显微镜下染料渗漏测量

Stereomicroscopic Dye Leakage Measurement of Six Different Root Canal Sealers.

作者信息

Ballullaya Srinidhi V, Vinay Vusurumarthi, Thumu Jayaprakash, Devalla Srihari, Bollu Indira Priyadarshini, Balla Sagarika

机构信息

Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Postgraduate student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZC65-ZC68. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25780.10077. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2017/25780.10077
PMID:28764296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5534516/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hermetic sealing of the root canal is the most desirable outcome of any root canal treatment, but almost always the filling of the root canal is defective, which is a multifactorial outcome. One such factor majorly influencing the obturation is the root canal sealer used.

AIM

The present study was done for evaluating microleakage in different root canal sealers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty extracted human single rooted teeeth were used in this in-vitro study. Sealers tested for microleakage in this study were zinc oxide eugenol based sealer, Sealapex, AH Plus, MTA Plus, EndoRez, Endosequence BC. All the specimens were examined under stereomicroscope for microleakage and the obtained data were statistically analysed using One-way ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple comparision tests using the software GraphPad Prism 7.02.

RESULTS

The Endosequence BC group showed the least dye leakage and the highest leakage was seen in Zinc oxide Eugenol based sealer.

CONCLUSION

Bio ceramic salers being hydrophilic show better sealing ability compared to resin based and eugenol based sealers.

摘要

引言

根管的严密封闭是任何根管治疗最理想的结果,但根管充填几乎总是存在缺陷,这是一个多因素导致的结果。其中一个主要影响充填效果的因素是所使用的根管封闭剂。

目的

本研究旨在评估不同根管封闭剂的微渗漏情况。

材料与方法

本体外研究使用了60颗拔除的人单根牙。本研究中测试微渗漏的封闭剂有氧化锌丁香酚类封闭剂、Sealapex、AH Plus、MTA Plus、EndoRez、Endosequence BC。所有标本在体视显微镜下检查微渗漏情况,所得数据使用GraphPad Prism 7.02软件进行单因素方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验进行统计学分析。

结果

Endosequence BC组显示出最少的染料渗漏,而氧化锌丁香酚类封闭剂的渗漏最多。

结论

与树脂类和丁香酚类封闭剂相比,亲水性的生物陶瓷封闭剂显示出更好的封闭能力。

相似文献

1
Stereomicroscopic Dye Leakage Measurement of Six Different Root Canal Sealers.六种不同根管封闭剂的体视显微镜下染料渗漏测量
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZC65-ZC68. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25780.10077. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
2
Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)-Based, Resin-Based, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study.基于三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)、树脂和氧化锌丁香酚根管封闭剂封闭能力的比较评价:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 13;16(1):e52201. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52201. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Root Canal Sealers- An invitro Study.四种不同根管封闭剂封闭能力的体视显微镜评价——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):ZC37-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19477.8246. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
A Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis of Sealing Potential and Marginal Adaptation of Different Root Canal Sealers to Dentin: An study.不同根管封闭剂对牙本质的封闭潜力和边缘适应性的扫描电子显微镜分析:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):73-77.
5
Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers.5种根管封闭剂的物理性能
J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
6
Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus & epiphany: An in vitro study.生物陶瓷封闭剂、AH plus和Epiphany根尖封闭能力的体外研究评估。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Nov;17(6):579-82. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.144609.
7
A Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of New MTA Based Sealers with Conventional Resin Based Sealer: An In-vitro Study.新型基于MTA的封闭剂与传统树脂基封闭剂封闭能力的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC76-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18909.8194. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
8
Microleakage of Single-Cone Gutta-Percha Obturation Technique in Combination with Different Types of Sealers.单锥牙胶尖充填技术联合不同类型封闭剂的微渗漏
Iran Endod J. 2015 Summer;10(3):199-203. doi: 10.7508/iej.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
9
Evaluation of apical microleakage of teeth sealed with four different root canal sealers.四种不同根管封闭剂封闭牙齿根尖微渗漏的评估
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Oct;14(5):341-5. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000500008.
10
Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistances of endodontically treated teeth filled using five different root canal filling systems.使用五种不同根管充填系统对根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性进行比较评估。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):667-72. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.144375.

引用本文的文献

1
Sealing ability of the single-cone obturation technique with bioceramic sealer iRoot SP in oval root canals: an in vitro study.使用生物陶瓷封闭剂iRoot SP的单尖充填技术在椭圆形根管中的封闭能力:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):1364. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06713-9.
2
Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Different Endodontic Sealers - An Study.不同根管充填封闭剂根尖封闭能力的比较——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S513-S515. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_468_25. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Bond Strength, and Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers: An Study.根管封闭剂的封闭能力、粘结强度和抗菌性能的比较评价:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3942-S3944. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1110_24. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth.单根管牙中冷陶瓷封闭剂与单锥充填技术的边缘适应性与AH-26封闭剂与侧向加压充填技术的边缘适应性的体外比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05314-2.
5
Obturation quality of bioceramic sealers with different obturation techniques: a micro-CT evaluation.不同充填技术下生物陶瓷封闭剂的充填质量:显微CT评估
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31146. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82481-w.
6
Comparative Assessment of Push-Out Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Different Calcium-Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.不同硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的推出粘结强度和牙本质小管渗透的比较评估
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;12(12):397. doi: 10.3390/dj12120397.
7
Evaluation of Microleakage of Orthograde Root-Filling Materials in Immature Permanent Teeth: An In Vitro Study.未成熟恒牙中垂直加压根充材料微渗漏的评估:一项体外研究
Int J Biomater. 2024 Oct 29;2024:8867854. doi: 10.1155/2024/8867854. eCollection 2024.
8
Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.牙髓封闭剂和粘固剂的生物学特性与溶解性
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 Jun 4;11:40863. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863. eCollection 2024.
9
Stereomicroscopic evaluation of sealing ability of four different root canal sealers: an in-vitro study.立体显微镜评估四种不同根管封闭剂的密封能力:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03913-7.
10
Exploring the Most Effective Apical Seal for Contemporary Bioceramic and Conventional Endodontic Sealers Using Three Obturation Techniques.探讨三种根管充填技术中当代生物陶瓷和传统根管封闭剂最有效的根尖封闭效果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 14;59(3):567. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030567.

本文引用的文献

1
Marginal adaptation of newer root canal sealers to dentin: A SEM study.新型根管封闭剂与牙本质的边缘适应性:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):360-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186453.
2
Antimicrobial efficacy of different root canal sealers by using real-time polymerase chain reaction: An ex vivo study.运用实时聚合酶链反应评估不同根管封闭剂的抗菌效果:一项体外研究
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;18(6):474-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.168814.
3
Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers.基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的界面适应性和厚度
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(4):516-21. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-049.
4
Sealing ability of three hydrophilic single-cone obturation systems: An in vitro glucose leakage study.三种亲水性单尖充填系统的封闭能力:一项体外葡萄糖渗漏研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Mar;6(Suppl 1):S86-9. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.152953.
5
Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus & epiphany: An in vitro study.生物陶瓷封闭剂、AH plus和Epiphany根尖封闭能力的体外研究评估。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Nov;17(6):579-82. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.144609.
6
Evaluation of Apical Micro-leakage of Different Endodontic Sealers in the Presence and Absence of Moisture.在有湿气和无湿气情况下不同根管封闭剂根尖微渗漏的评估
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014 Summer;8(3):125-9. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2014.023. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
7
Effect of photo-activated disinfection on bond strength of three different root canal sealers.光活化消毒对三种不同根管封闭剂粘结强度的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):85-89. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126252.
8
Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers.5种根管封闭剂的物理性能
J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
9
Solubility and apical sealing characteristics of a new calcium silicate-based root canal sealer in comparison to calcium hydroxide-, methacrylate resin- and epoxy resin-based sealers.一种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的溶解性和顶端密封性与氢氧化钙、甲基丙烯酸树脂和环氧树脂基封闭剂的比较。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May-Jul;71(3-4):857-62. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.734410. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
10
Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer.评价一种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的射线可透性、pH 值、钙离子释放和流动性。
J Endod. 2012 Jun;38(6):842-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Apr 4.