Gluecker Thomas M, Bongartz Georg, Ledermann Hans Peter, Bilecen Deniz
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel, Switzerland 4032.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):905-10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1007.
The purpose of our study was to assess the impact of various injection rates on contrast-enhanced high-resolution 3D MR angiography of the hand.
Ten healthy individuals (mean age, 24.4 years; range, 20-27 years) underwent 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of both hands. Starting 3 minutes before data acquisition, subsystolic upper arm cuff compression was applied unilaterally. A 1.5-T whole-body scanner with 3D gradient-echo sequence was used. Seven data sets (20 seconds) were obtained consecutively. I.v. contrast material of 0.1 mg/kg of body weight of gadobutrol was injected at rates of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mL/s. For both hands, quantitative data evaluation was performed with contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the radial, ulnar, palmar, and digital arteries and veins. Qualitative assessment of the arterial visualization score and venous contamination score was rated by two experienced radiologists using a 4-point scale.
The lowest venous contamination score (CNR and reviewers' assessment) was observed with an injection rate of 0.5 mL/s (p < 0.05). For the arterial signal, the reviewers' assessment was that an injection rate of 0.5 mL/s was best (p = 0.08). Compression yielded a significantly lower venous contamination score for the compressed side than for the noncompressed side for flow rates of 0.5 mL/s and 1.0 mL/s (p < 0.05).
Image quality of hand MR angiography was better with cuff compression. A flow rate of 0.5 mL/s yielded a good CNR and a significantly lower venous contamination score than the other flow rates.
本研究旨在评估不同注射速率对手部对比增强高分辨率三维磁共振血管造影的影响。
10名健康个体(平均年龄24.4岁;范围20 - 27岁)接受了双手的三维对比增强磁共振血管造影检查。在数据采集前3分钟开始,单侧应用收缩期下臂袖带压迫。使用配备三维梯度回波序列的1.5T全身扫描仪。连续获取7组数据集(20秒)。以0.5、1.0和1.5 mL/s的速率静脉注射0.1 mg/kg体重的钆布醇对比剂。对于双手,在桡动脉、尺动脉、掌动脉和指动脉及静脉中采用对比噪声比(CNR)进行定量数据评估。由两名经验丰富的放射科医生使用4分制对动脉显影评分和静脉污染评分进行定性评估。
注射速率为0.5 mL/s时观察到最低的静脉污染评分(CNR和观察者评估)(p < 0.05)。对于动脉信号,观察者评估认为注射速率为0.5 mL/s最佳(p = 0.08)。对于0.5 mL/s和1.0 mL/s的流速,压迫侧的静脉污染评分显著低于未压迫侧(p < 0.05)。
袖带压迫时手部磁共振血管造影的图像质量更好。0.5 mL/s的流速产生了良好的CNR,且静脉污染评分显著低于其他流速。