Pfau Thilo, Witte Thomas H, Wilson Alan M
Structure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, UK.
J Exp Biol. 2006 Oct;209(Pt 19):3742-57. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02439.
During locomotion cyclical interchange between different forms of mechanical energy enhances economy; however, 100% efficiency cannot be achieved and ultimately some mechanical work must be performed de novo. There is a metabolic cost associated with fluctuations in mechanical energy, even in the most efficient animals. In this study we investigate the exchanges between different forms of mechanical energy involved in high-speed gallop locomotion in Thoroughbred race horses during over-ground locomotion using innovative, mobile data collection techniques. We use hoof-mounted accelerometers to capture foot contact times, a GPS data logger to monitor speed and an inertial sensor mounted over the dorsal spinous processes of the fourth to sixth thoracic vertebrae (the withers) of the horse to capture trunk movement with six degrees of freedom. Trunk movement data were used to estimate the movement of the centre of mass (CoM). Linear (craniocaudal, mediolateral and dorsoventral) and rotational (roll, pitch and heading) kinematic parameters (displacement, velocity and acceleration) were calculated for seven horses at gallop speeds ranging from 7 to 17 m s(-1) during their regular training sessions. These were used to estimate external mechanical energy (potential energy and linear kinetic energy of the CoM) as well as selected components of internal energy (angular kinetic energy). Elastic energy storage in the limbs was estimated from duty factor, sine wave assumptions and published leg stiffness values. External mechanical energy changes were dominated by changes in craniocaudal velocity. Potential energy change, which was in phase with craniocaudal energy during the front limb stances, was small. Elastic energy storage in the limbs was small compared to the overall amplitude of fluctuation of external mechanical energy. Galloping at high speeds does not therefore fit classical spring mass mechanics.
在运动过程中,不同形式机械能之间的周期性转换可提高效率;然而,无法实现100%的效率,最终必须重新进行一些机械功。即使在最有效的动物中,机械能的波动也存在代谢成本。在本研究中,我们使用创新的移动数据收集技术,研究纯种赛马在地面高速疾驰运动中不同形式机械能之间的转换。我们使用安装在蹄部的加速度计来记录足部接触时间,使用GPS数据记录器来监测速度,并在马的第四至第六胸椎棘突(肩胛)上方安装惯性传感器,以捕捉具有六个自由度的躯干运动。躯干运动数据用于估计质心(CoM)的运动。在七匹马的常规训练期间,以7至17米每秒(-1)的疾驰速度计算线性(头尾、内外侧和背腹)和旋转(滚动、俯仰和航向)运动学参数(位移、速度和加速度)。这些参数用于估计外部机械能(CoM的势能和线性动能)以及内部能量的选定分量(角动能)。肢体中的弹性储能通过负荷因子、正弦波假设和已发表的腿部刚度值进行估计。外部机械能变化主要由头尾速度变化主导。在前肢站立期间与头尾能量同相的势能变化很小。与外部机械能波动的总体幅度相比,肢体中的弹性储能较小。因此,高速疾驰不符合经典的弹簧质量力学。